jroid8@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoknow the features of your languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square145linkfedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down124
arrow-up1623arrow-down1imageknow the features of your languagelemmy.worldjroid8@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square145linkfedilink
minus-squareblawsybogsy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up18·edit-22 years ago(or a b) i never thought of lisp as concise before
minus-squareTΛVΛR@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoTrue for all the lisps without explicit false (in the others its more or less a technicality) Gotta love though that when lisp is concise it does so without overloading syntax
minus-squarebnaur@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 years agoPractical, but not really equivalent though because of nil punning.
(or a b)
i never thought of lisp as concise before
True for all the lisps without explicit
false
(in the others its more or less a technicality)Gotta love though that when lisp is concise it does so without overloading syntax
Practical, but not really equivalent though because of nil punning.