Liz Magill, president of the university of Pennsylvania, was also forced to resign. The third person is Sally Kornbluth, academic administrator of the m.i.t., the only one who wasn’t forced to resign, probably because she’s jewish herself.
(wiki article)
No point in saying that she doesn’t want jews to be exterminated, her enemies know better than her what she’s really thinking, and there’s no possibility to walk back on these specific words to specify what she meant, it’s so stupid 🙄. She obviously interpreted the question(, of whether calling for the genocide of jews is against Harvard’s code of conduct,) as something loaded since “from the river to the sea” manifestations would then have to be prohibited(, well, you can liberate the territory by killing 1% of the israeli population and forcing the rest to flee, we’ve learned recently that it wouldn’t be a genocide, if such word means something). In retrospect she could have said that the only acceptable speeches on the campus are those calling for a two-states solution or something else that accepts Israel’s possession of the holy lands, but as usual calling for the destruction of Palestine isn’t as horrible as calling for the destruction of Israel.
Reuters article
If the plagiarism allegations are true, the fact that there’s also pressure to resign over her congressional testimony doesn’t matter. This is why you have to clean your own house in an organization – you’ll eventually run into opposition that wants to discredit your leadership, and you can’t give them anything real to hang their hat on. Harvard can’t simply say “we’re keeping a plagarist in charge” no matter how bullshit the Zionist pressure is.
If the plagarism allegations are false, there’s still plenty to criticize here: how do you not anticipate and have a better response to “when did you stop beating your wife?” questions if you’re testifying to Congress?