• Psaldorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Newest versions of windows 11 make it incredibly hard to find the screen that shows all your network adapters. It is now easier to use device manager to disable and reenable an adapter.

    How do I know? Because all the shit tier screens and tools that offer to help you with a network issue didn’t work. ONLY reenabling the NIC did.

    Had to do it on my whole network

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 months ago

      Learn the ways of the run prompt: ncpa.cpl launches you right to the classic network adapter control panel screen. I have to get in there so often that I’ve taught myself plenty of those little shortcuts because MS can’t leave shit where it was.

      • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        JSYK they are planning to drop .cpl support in a future w11 update. I know it sounds like crazytown to anyone who has worked in IT but here we are.

        They hate control panel now and I cannot figure out for the life of me why.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        …And it all has to be there for legacy compatibility, because some Fortune 500 company somewhere has some rickety piece of shit in-house “enterprise” software that relies on some obscure aspect or another of a past Windows version.

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I am sort of partial to those rickity old systems that force them to keep legacy software compatibility.

          I can still load up and use a program that was written 20 years ago for windows XP.

          It also gives third parties like classic shell or startallback the ability to restore all the functionality that the newest start menu disaster tries to push.

        • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          IT person here: this is absolutely correct. I know of two buildings in a ridiculously expensive zip code known for international trade that their entire HVAC system is run by a grey case XP box that MUST always have internet connection.

          It was considered a cost saving method at the time as opposed to real building services control panels and the company that wrote and sold the software to the local companies went out of business in 2001. There are more businesses in this position just these are the only two I’ve personally been called to service.

          In both cases neither machine had been allowed to reboot for more than a decade because of the legitimate fear that the hard drive bearings would fail if they were allowed to spin down.

          And neither were interested in replacing it

        • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Did you use cmd with elevated admin privileges? Try right click cmd and run as admin if you don’t know what I’m talking about. Windoze stopped running cmd with elevated privileges sometime around Win7. From a security perspective it makes a lot of sense to do that as default, even though it can be a bit of a pain for home users that expect to have admin for everything they do.

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Disabling and enabling a network adapter using a GUI is trivial on most Linux desktops. So not helping Microsoft’s case.

    • skizzles@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why don’t you just use control panel?

      I never use the windows settings menu unless I absolutely have to because, like you insinuated, it’s really not that great.

      Control panel on the other hand is still there and will get you exactly where you need much quicker.

        • skizzles@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, my primary is Kubuntu. I have windows on the side for the few games I have that I need it for.

        • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s definitely looking like a possibility. I do my work on Linux machines but only use win for games. If I can play my main community games it might be time to make the switch for good

          • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            if you dont play games that use anticheat you’re probs okay.

            most everything else either works with proton out the box or with some small tweaks.

            protondb is the best resource for linux gaming imo

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You can also just search “network” and the screen they want is either the first or second result. I rarely ever go into any kinds of settings menus anymore, i just search on the start menu.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Because windows 11 is an updated version of windows 19 and windows 10 is an updated version of windows 7/8.1.

            Each one of them has had holdovers of previous versions of windows. And each one has tried to bring in a new standard to bring them all together but they’ve always moved on to the next standard before finishing it. Windows 11 has actually came the closest but we’re not there yet and because it’s actively replaced old methods of doing things in this process it feels more fractured than before because we’re not used to looking in the new places for them.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I feel like making important changes was easiest with XP. It feels like they’re trying to obscure administrative functions behind layers of abstraction.

    • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Kind of feel like Windows 11 is trying to appeal most to people who only use Windows for stuff like Outlook and Excel.

      If your job requires any niche or specialized software. Or if you need your Windows system for managing networks and stuff like that, you’re probably better off sticking with older windows or jumping to Linux.

      Obviously it’s not as easy as just switching to Linux, especially for larger organizations etc. But it gets easier with every new version of Ubuntu, Fedora etc.