Google’s YouTube and Spotify Technology SA, the world’s most popular video and music services, are joining Netflix Inc. in steering clear of Apple Inc.’s upcoming mixed-reality headset.
  • Users of those services will be steered toward the web
  • Searches indicate apps from Meta may also be unavailable

Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/4kfYI

  • SinningStromgald@lemmy.worldEnglish
    152·
    10 months ago

    From what randos on the net have said the next closest headset that doesn’t require a computer to operate costs $5k+ so from an enterprise standpoint they could more cost efficient there. So apparently it might appeal to the enterprise market.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      141·
      10 months ago

      I have seen much dumber, much more expensive tech in the wild in offices.

      If it lives up to the hype, it could replace 2-3 desktop monitors (or convince some executives it can, anyway). It’s about the same price as two Apple Studio Displays. I’ve seen offices with very expensive standard equipment. $3500 per employee isn’t all that much to begin with if it’s legitimately useful.

      • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
        31·
        10 months ago

        I’m just genuinely confused by the value proposition. $3500 seems to be about a 1000% Apple Tax over comparable tech. I’m sure the interface will be slightly nicer, but the Venn diagram of those who need the unique benefits of Apple’s product overlapping those who have this much money to spend has to be very small. For business or personal use.

          • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
            2·
            10 months ago

            To be clear, my value question and note about the Venn diagram is that there may be a specific configuration of features only on the Vision Pro, but “comparable tech” includes to me all of the standard VR/AR products out there that as I understand it (correct me if I’m wrong) can do 95% of what Vision Pro can do. So, the Quest line, the Vive line. Even the ultra high-end products I think are only $1500, aren’t they?

            • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              10 months ago

              I’ve got a Vive, it’s nice but I wouldn’t say it’s comparable to the Apple headset. It’s VR only, like Meta’s but Apple are trying to do both AR and VR. The biggest difference though is in the displays. The Vive is great for gaming but that’s about it. Movies don’t look to great and working with text is a horrible experience due to the low resolution and the screen door effect.

              Apple’s is probably the first “affordable” headset that can be used as a replacement for a monitor.

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          12·
          10 months ago

          There is no comparable tech.

          You can’t get just a headset with comparable resolution, without the high quality low latency passthrough or the computer, for meaningfully less.