• ihavenopeopleskills@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago
    1. Yes.

    2. Providing context doesn’t magically make something morally correct. It illustrates the circumstances.

    There are all kinds of circumstances under which people commit grave wrongs in the face of adversity. If we’re going to punish everyone for every wrong committed regardless of surrounding circumstances, there’s far more punishment to dispense, regardless of political stripes.

    • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re defending the circumstances of the time, unfortunately. You’re not even fully condemning it, or saying it shouldn’t have happened in the first place

    • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes.

      So would you like to explain how a failed proposal to extinguish slavery almost a hundred years before the rebellion was a big reason why the South fought their slaver rebellion?

      Providing context doesn’t magically make something morally correct. It illustrates the circumstances.

      “But you have to understand the context!” brought up in response to a condemnation of the evil is a plea for sympathy. Don’t play coy.

      There are all kinds of circumstances under which people commit grave wrongs in the face of adversity. If we’re going to punish everyone for every wrong committed regardless of surrounding circumstances, there’s far more punishment to dispense, regardless of political stripes.

      Okay. I support only punishing people for serious wrongs committed. Like enforcing the bondage of one’s fellow man in one of the most cruel and vile systems of our nation’s history, treason, or murder of American citizens.