You must log in or register to comment.
We built a data set of 45 million comments on news articles on the Huffington Post website between January 2013 and February 2015.
I am no expert but I feel like this is a really bad data set choice for this study.
It is. They should’ve used Reddit and Twitter posts/comments from it’s start to the present to get a more accurate database
Or from the start up until like 2016 when the shills and bots started showing up en masse.
we built a dataset of three of my comments and found that…
It’s just a bad data set for basically anything
Yup, comments on news articles are pure cancer. Comments about news articles can be decent though, but they need to be hosted elsewhere.
The greater internet fuckwad theory applies to all things digital. It turns 20 this april: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/greater-internet-fuckwad-theory
You can take out the anonymity part and the equation is pretty much the same. The real problem is the audience imo.
A persona allows people who otherwise wouldn’t to experiment with being magnanimous and making/admitting mistakes(some more cautious IRL, others incapable of backing down).
OTOH, there’s always people who play Paladins on tabletop, and the mitigating factor of the Block button - most who don’t want to aren’t forced to engage with the worst of us, and blocking someone who knows you IRL has a more complicated cost/benefit calculation. This is one thing I feel cancel culture and the younger generations get right; Screw the other consequences when not blocking that shitty uncle, boss, teacher, coworker, celebrity, whoever, is letting them monopolize some of your personal time and mental energy.
Interesting. But the article headline is misleading. The article states that the biggest difference was between volatile anonymity where people could make arbitrarily many accounts, and stable pseudonyms, where a ban cannot easily be evaded. Stable pseudonyms are a lot better as the article states.
Between stable pseudonyms and real names, the difference is smaller, as stated in the article. Real names make it only slightly worse.
Or in other words, effective bans work best for moderating a community. Shocking news I tell you.
am still sour [._.]
How dare anyone impugn the integrity of Weedlord Bonerhitler69? The man stands as a colossus of virtue.
I was not sure where to share that “interesting blog post” so here is it on the main community. Most of us care about anonymity, so always interesting to see that it’s supported by evidences
