???@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 10 months ago"Noooo, us? No, we would NEVER do a genocide! Here, look at these testimonies from OUR experts! Ignore the UN, Amnesty, WHO, B'Tselem, Doctors Without Borders, and especially the PRCS"i.imgflip.comimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1255arrow-down143
arrow-up1212arrow-down1image"Noooo, us? No, we would NEVER do a genocide! Here, look at these testimonies from OUR experts! Ignore the UN, Amnesty, WHO, B'Tselem, Doctors Without Borders, and especially the PRCS"i.imgflip.com???@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-square???@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·10 months agoIt wouldn’t hurt you to be nice.
minus-squarePugJesus@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·10 months ago It wouldn’t hurt you to be nice. That’s not an unfair position to take, but it’s not me. I can de-escalate, but not in the face of positions I find outrageous.
minus-square???@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·9 months ago It. Does. Not. Excuse. Genocide The sad part is that we agree but I don’t think you’re able to see it.
minus-squarePugJesus@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·9 months ago Granted, maybe your point is that we shouldn’t consider all these details when determining whether or not a massacre is part of a genocide campaign, No, no, you outlined my position and our conflict just fine here. ‘These details’ are irrelevant. That’s my point. but it’s generally a bad idea to ignore context. There is no context that can justify it. It’s like saying one has to look at the context of a rape before judging it. You really fucking don’t.
minus-square???@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·9 months agoI understand your frustration.
minus-squarePugJesus@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoI don’t think we’re in a strong disagreement on the subject. It’s a detail. But it is a disagreement on how to approach things.
It wouldn’t hurt you to be nice.
That’s not an unfair position to take, but it’s not me. I can de-escalate, but not in the face of positions I find outrageous.
The sad part is that we agree but I don’t think you’re able to see it.
No, no, you outlined my position and our conflict just fine here. ‘These details’ are irrelevant. That’s my point.
There is no context that can justify it. It’s like saying one has to look at the context of a rape before judging it. You really fucking don’t.
I understand your frustration.
I don’t think we’re in a strong disagreement on the subject. It’s a detail. But it is a disagreement on how to approach things.