Examples:

Your post: "What if God did this weird thing…

Their reply: “God doesn’t exist so this question is nonsense.”

Your post: “In the year 2075 everyone gets assigned jobs based on…”

Their reply: “Dude, with climate change there will be no us or jobs to do in 2075.”

It’s the Internet. People are trying to have fun and talk about wacky shit and escape from serious matters. Can’t you either refrain from commenting or just play along?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes,_and…

  • Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    You’ve unironically done the thing this post is about.

    The top comment in this chain assumes that everyone should be able to “picture this.” I would also say that it assumes that the person explaining the “this” to be pictured is doing so sufficiently. Parent commenter points out that the “hypothetical” as designed has a flaw in its assumptions, and I have explained another.

    If the aim is to have an understanding of reality that is more accurate, so that our interactions can be more productive, being aware of these kinds of flaws in assumptions is valuable. If the aim is “being right on the internet,” then denying those flaws is what happens.