Please start your comments with the following question answered at the top:

“Will you vote for Biden in the 2024 election?” [Y/N]

  • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let me get this straight - you want the government to cut a check made out to Donald Trump for a “literal army” of lawyers? Because that’s how that would work. The criminal justice system cannot place an unreasonable financial burden on a defendant that is presumed innocent.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lmamamamamamamamao

      Hold on.

      The criminal justice system cannot place an unreasonable financial burden on a defendant that is presumed innocent.

      Yup still laughing. Just a minute.

      Okay okay. If Martha mother of 2 can end up homeless, in and out of jail, and jobless, because her court appointed attorney got her a not guilty verdict then Trump can fucking pay for lawyers.

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If Martha mother of 2 can end up homeless, in and out of jail, and jobless, because her court appointed attorney got her a not guilty verdict

        Did you mean a guilty verdict? In either case, you have a point. The justice system is far from perfect, and what you’ve described is a perfect example of that: courts tend to respect financial burden more than they do conflicting obligations (e.g. a job). But should we be advocating for an objectively worse legal system because Trump is protected from being forced to choose between inadequate representation or shelling out tens of millions of dollars? I don’t think so.