it is so dystopian…

  • nivenkos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    10 months ago

    How long until people will be carrying Raspberry Pis over the borders for their own hotspots? /s

    It’s crazy how quickly mass censorship is becoming commonplace though. From shadowbanning on Reddit and Twitter, to court blocking in the UK, Spain and Italy.

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    10 months ago

    AirVPN is an Italian company incorporated in Rome.

    Of course they comply. 99.9% of VPN providers are however not domiciled in Italy or elsewhere in the EU, and don’t give a flying fuck about Italian demands and jurisdiction.

    This is a total non-issue.

    • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Exactly: Italian companies (like AirVPN) are now forced to comply to the new law, but being a member of the EU means you cannot forbid other EU countries to sell you their products. So any Italian citizen has still the right to purchase the same service from any other Country, thus stifling their own economy.
      The current Italian Government keeps fucking themself in their own ass with this kind of actions: they get bribed by big companies (in this case Comcast’s Sky and DAZN) and keep putting in serious difficulties small local companies, because of their total inability to think even a single a step ahead

      • micka190@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Reading the article: A ruling body filled with randos puts a site on a block list and every VPN operating in Italy must block the site within 30 minutes. There is no review or judicial oversight to sites added to the block list. This seems to include all forms of VPNs, including corporate ones. They could start charging a premium to Italian users which would start affecting businesses, I guess.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          This seems to include all forms of VPNs, including corporate ones.

          Eh, I doubt it. If the exit point is in Italy it would be going through an Italian ISP, and that ISP should be responsible for enforcing the filter, the same as it would be for a retail customer.

          • micka190@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            10 months ago

            A document detailing technical requirements of Italy’s Piracy Shield anti-piracy system confirms that ISPs are not alone in being required to block pirate IPTV services. All VPN and open DNS services must also comply with blocking orders, including through accreditation to the Piracy Shield platform.

            According to the article, it requires them to get accreditation to operate in in Italy, unless I’m reading that wrong.

            Most corporate VPN companies I’ve dealt with would love to slip in additional cost to counteract this cost on their end.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              According to the article, it requires them to get accreditation to operate in in Italy, unless I’m reading that wrong.

              Uh huh. So, I put a DNS server and VPN server online, and an Italian happens to find it. Is Italy going to try to extradite me or something?

              • micka190@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                10 months ago

                Disclaimer: This is speculation, because I haven’t read the actual law (and I’m not Italian, so it’s not like I really have a reason to).

                I would assume that they will handle it like this:

                To be able to sell your VPN service in Italy, you’ll have to get accredited. Since you’re now taking Italian customers’ money, your company’s dealings in Italy fall under Italian law. They might be able to extradite you, depending on what country you operate from, but realistically most businesses don’t want to get involved in that kind of stuff, because even if you don’t get extradited, no one wants to be put in a situation where they need to actively avoid a country.

                This leaves free VPN services, right? Well, since ISP and “legal” VPNs need to conform to the new law, the Italian government could blacklist those VPNs’ websites (which all ISPs and legal VPNs are required by law to block within 30 minutes of them being added to the block list). So now, you’re in an awkward position as an Italian if you want to get a VPN that doesn’t follow those laws.

                I’m not sure at what extent this law goes, or how they handle people who are paying to circumvent it (because you might have bought a VPN before this), but they might simply require that banks refuse to process payments from VPN providers that refuse to get accredited.

                Obviously, they can’t really block this thing without going the Great Firewall route (and even that has ways of being bypassed), but that’s not really their goal here. Their goal is to establish a stranglehold on what the everyday citizen does. It’s to put a framework in place that allows them to quickly and efficiently block content they deem you shouldn’t be able to see. It’s a disgusting display of a government overreaching and censoring what their citizens’ have access to on the web.

      • Lath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Lol. It’s common place for companies to use pirated software in order to reduce costs.
        Licences and subscriptions can get expensive, so when companies get forced to increase costs, they tend to fuck off somewhere else.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          In poorer countries, sure.

          In most 1st world countries, using pirated software is basically giving groups like FAST a licence to fuck you out of business.

          • Lath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Italy isn’t a 1st world country. It only looks that way at the top.

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s really not.

          In poor countries sure, but not the US or Europe. You will get sued and you will pay if you do that at any scale.

          • Lath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Lol. You think Italy is rich? The lower you go down the boot, the poorer the leather.
            Remember the bridge that collapsed because the company that built it cut corners? That’s the standard of business there.

            • sudneo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              The bridge was near Genova, in the North, btw. For good or for bad, Italy is still a member of g7, and despite the gazillion problems, relatively to other countries, it is a rich country.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not really. The article mentions exactly one provider that doesn’t accept Italian users… And if you look into AirVPN, you’ll find that it’s an Italian company… i.e. the only provider actually within the realm of Italian cease & desist orders. Nobody else cares whatsoever.

  • Moonrise2473
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s another one after airvpn? That was because they had the headquarters in Italy so they had no other choice.

    • Moonrise2473
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 months ago

      They will just buy a VPN from a company that isn’t incorporated in Italy (airvpn is based in Italy so they were forced to do that)

      And everyone in Italy need to be forced to get a VPN as we (I’m Italian) gave the keys to a few copyright trolls with no supervision or repercussions for wrong blockings.

      Saturday afternoon my uptime Kuma telegram bot started to send me hundreds of notifications “your websites are down!” And I panicked. I literally had no idea what was going on. My server was ok, why I couldn’t access my websites? Rebooted 5 times, still down. Cloudflare tunnels were giving a weird error. After two hours of troubleshooting and still hundreds of down notifications I just gave up. “Maybe it’s an issue with cloudflare” - I thought. I disabled the telegram bot and I went to sleep.

      It was the fucking copyright trolls that blocked fucking cloudflare

      And no official media talked about this. When Facebook has 3 minutes of downtime, the news on TV act like Italy was cut out from the world for a week. Here the copyright trolls blocked the biggest CDN in the world for a fucking day and the media fucking ignored the issue. Not a single news about that. The block was silently removed, and it never officially happened.

      I hope that this disaster triggers the EU to forbid a platform like this because this is too dangerous. What if next time instead of blocking cloudflare accidentally it’s blocked “accidentally”?

  • MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I was in Italy in maybe 2013 or 2014 and every vpn ever was blocked. The only one that wasn’t blocked was the one running on my home server back home. Even mcdonalds wifi in Methsota US isn’t like that.

  • MissJinx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Italian population is very old. This old generation of white man can’t die fast enough

    • sudneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      This whole thing happened while a young woman is in power. This has to do with submission to economic power, not with gender and age.

      • nihilvain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think from her part it was more about planting the seeds of a censorship tool than pleasing economic powers. Right-wing scum always attack freedom of speech first.

        • sudneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t think this is needed to implement censorship. It’s Italy, I know better than thinking something is done out of malice, when it can be the result of incompetence. I completely believe this is some idiotic implementation of what football an TV economic powers wanted. Either way, this idea that everything bad is because “old white men” is bs. We don’t even need meloni, we can use the dear iron lady as an example…class and economic positions count way more than age and gender, ultimately.