• Rinox
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes, but I’m not sure if we want to open the “programming language can of worms”.

    There’s B, C, C++, C#, Objective-C, D, E, F, F#, F* and so many more. Also, they may or may not have anything to do with each other

      • Rinox
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        The number of job applications using Java as a shorthand for Javascript…

      • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I once had a C# dev tell me they couldn’t run JavaScript because they didn’t have Java installed.

    • jyte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also I’ve read that C# is C++++ (like put those + on 2x2 table, which in turns ressemble a #)

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hahaha I’ve never heard that before. Seems legit.

        C# was originally “Java: The Good Parts” but but these days it’s a much more advanced language and runtime compared to Java.

        • Zangoose@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          As a dev who works on both Java and C# code, modern Java (17+) and C# feel almost exactly the same (not sure if Java has extension methods though).

          Bonus points for using Kotlin instead tho. I dislike both Java and C# just because they both allow any object to be null and that’s usually a headache whenever a null exception shows up.

          The only thing I like better about C# is the Fixture library for testing. I haven’t found any mature libraries like it for Java yet.