Ideally, there’d be a simple RPM installer compatible with Alma 9 that I can point to a samba share that holds all the photos, kind of like what I do with Jellyfin. Also nice if it uses an otherwise unused port or I can easily set what port it uses.

My googling is finding a bunch of docker stuff, which always seems needlessly complicated to me vs an RPM… I’m also using a low powered x86 tiny computer to front JellyFin and would like to host this on the same computer vs needing another server.

Any ideas?

  • Phrey@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    7·
    10 months ago

    No one is forcing you to use containers for Immich. It’s simply the most robust way to support it for the team.

    You can just take a look at the dockerfiles and follow those steps on bare metal.

    • ShimitarEnglish
      12·
      10 months ago

      No, I am forced to use containers because… There are no instructions for bare-metal installation and they also do not provide any instruction on how to build from sources (and I tried…)

      Also, there are no binary releases only docker-compose.

      All in all, immich cannot be deployed but with containers.

      No choice: not good.

      • Phrey@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
        3·
        10 months ago

        Like I said, if you follow the dockerfiles you will end up with a similar result on bare metal.

        It’s your own decision if you want to deviate from what the developers want to support.

        A project doesn’t need to produce binary releases.

        • ShimitarEnglish
          1·
          10 months ago

          It is true that a project doesn’t need to release binaries. But either those or the instructions on how to build from sources I think are somewhat expected.

          Said so, I am hosting immich on docker because, specially on such fast evolving and kind of “beta” software its by far the fastest way.

      • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        1·
        10 months ago

        A Dockerfile itself is the instruction set. There is a certain minimum requirement expected from a server admin that differs from end-user requirements.

        The ease of docker obfuscates that quite a bit but if you want to go full bare metal (or full AWS or GCS, etc etc) then you need to manage the full admin part as well - including custom deployments.

        • ShimitarEnglish
          2·
          10 months ago

          Indeed I am a quite proficient sysadmin for my home server, while not a professional one.

          I didn’t consider a docker file as instructions for bare metal install, thanks for the suggestion. I am currently using podman with immich because its release cycles are too fast for me to catch up otherwise.

          I am thinking to experiment with something different from immich because, while its a great tool, it’s “just” (no pun intended) a backup solution for mobile devices and I need something more than that.

          I was considering https://damselfly.info/ which looks more like the workflow I am looking to implement.