UCL bans lecturer from China course to protect its “commercial interests” – The Free Speech Union
www.telegraph.co.uk
The FSU has intervened after our member, UCL academic Michelle Shipworth, was banned from teaching her own course following a complaint by a Chinese student that a seminar discussion of modern slavery in China was too "provocative".

As first reported in the Telegraph, FSU member and University College London (UCL) academic Michelle Shipworth has been banned from teaching her own course, after a Chinese student complained that discussing modern slavery in China was too “provocative”. Incredibly, UCL sided with students who said they were “distressed” by her handling of the topic, and imposed a raft of restrictions on Michelle in order to ensure their courses remained “commercially viable” to Chinese students.

Michelle Shipworth is an Associate Professor at UCL’s Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, and has taught at the institution since 2009.

Michelle found herself under investigation after a seminar last October examining data from the Global Slavery Index 2014. The seminar forms part of her ‘Data Detectives’ training module, and is designed to prepare students for an assignment which external examiners have described as “particularly innovative” and “excellent”, and her Faculty’s teaching lead has previously stated is worthy of a teaching award.

  • maculata@aussie.zoneEnglish
    141·
    4 months ago

    China is synonymous with IP theft. No one should have any business with them. Full stop.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldEnglish
        7·
        4 months ago

        No it isn’t. Some level of IP laws are a very, very good thing.

        If I write a book or make a game, a publisher shouldn’t be allowed to come along, take it, and use their position in the industry to thoroughly outsell me.

        There’s a lot of BS in current IP law, but that doesn’t mean IP law as a concept is bad.