• evergreen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah that does sound like a failure. But also different time different place. Was there a Fentanyl epidemic of this scale 10 years ago in Florida? If the treatment options save just one person’s life, is it still a failure? Should we just say “yep nothing works, there’s no solution to daily ODs on the streets of the city.”?

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your right, 10 years ago people weren’t using welfare money on fent, they were using medicaid money on RXs for 180 OC30s.

      The solution is to end the drug war.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I always wonder why the disaster of massive amounts of legally available opiates is brought up as an argument to stop the restrictions on drugs altogether

        • evergreen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yeah, it’s like “Hey, look at the great improvement to my life since I’ve started taking 15 oxys per day! Everyone should be doing this!”

          Recreational use is one thing, but continuous, institutionally backed dependence is a whole different ballgame.

      • evergreen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, not that that’s ideal, but at least the OCs weren’t turning them into permanently mentally and physically crippled zombies, or suddenly killing them like fent does.

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          No, the Oxy just pushed people to fent once they could no longer get or afford their fix from the pharmacy.

      • evergreen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Because it’s a much more destructive drug, in a completely different state and city, with completely different demographics, political climate, and education level? 15 years into the future?

        • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Oh so you think everyone in CA on benefits in on drugs or something? The base idea remains the same. Don’t hide welfare behind drug testing it isn’t worth it

          • evergreen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            No I don’t think that and I never said that. Please don’t try and put words in my mouth.

            To be blunt, I think that the people in California, today, are much better equipped to take on this issue than the people in Florida were 15 years ago.

            • rambaroo@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              The fact that they passed this law despite the same kind of law literally never working ever anywhere just proves how wrong you are. It’s yet another stupid easy-sounding solution that makes people feel smug but won’t work

              Californians are just as dumb as Floridians apparently. So dumb that they can’t even learn from Florida’s big dumb mistakes, and probably were never aware of them in the first place.

              • evergreen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Did Florida’s law provision for treatment options? If not, then maybe it really isn’t the same “stupid easy-sounding solution”. I think that if you should take some time to read the article and understand the measure that was voted on, before you call the entire population of California as dumb as that of Florida…

                From the article:

                Breed’s office has said the measure was intentionally designed to be flexible on the treatment component. Treatment options could range from out-patient services to a prescription for buprenorphine, a medication used to treat addiction. They noted it doesn’t include a requirement for participants to remain sober, recognizing that people often lapse in recovery and shouldn’t be kicked out of the program for a slip-up.

            • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              All those drug addicted welfare queens in CA need to rot amirite? Since you hate welfare and the people on it.

              That’s putting words in your mouth. Keep making things up tho dude I’m sure it’ll take you far.

              • evergreen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Oh man he really showed me, by putting more words in my mouth… lol. I’m not going to wrestle with a pig here, Adolf! Enjoy your internet forum mud slinging battles!