• Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Im getting away with my 8gb for now.

    Its the language/text stuff that really needs like 30gb GPUs.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Im getting away with my 8gb for now.

      I don’t think that you can do the current XL models with 8GB, even for low-resolution images. Maybe with --lowvram or something.

      I’ve got a 24GB RX 7900 XT and would render higher resolution images if I had the VRAM – yeah, you can sometimes sort of get a similar effect by upscaling in tiles, but it’s not really a replacement. And I am confident that even if they put a consumer card out with 128GB, someone will figure out some new clever extension that does something fascinating and useful…as long as one can devote a little more memory to it…

      • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I do XL all the time, at about 30-45 seconds per image. 8gb is surprisingly enough for SDXL, and I run like 7gb models with 3-6 Lora on top.