• OpenStars@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I cannot stomach much of it, but it is fun to go back and watch older media related to technology - e.g. the six million dollar man has like spinning tape disks, when computers were entire-room affairs.

      So he was right, using the definition at that time, though there was also so much potential for more.

      Also it is funny to hear them say that technology would literally make the six million dollar man “better”, not just “well again” or “he will have side effects but his capabilities will be far above the norm” or some such. One glance at Google these days, or a Boeing plane, does not inspire me to think of the word “better” than what came before even from those exact companies. Technology moves forward, but I am not so sure that the new is always “better” than the old. It was an interesting bias that they had though, during the cold war and after the moon landing.

      • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Considering we now have a “CD” that stores 125TB of data ( https://www.livescience.com/technology/electronics/new-petabit-scale-optical-disc-can-store-as-much-information-as-15000-dvds ).

        Not all older tech are necessarily worse. An LTO-9 tape can also store 18TB of data per tape. It’s still sold today and great for archival.

        Other cheaper, less error prone tech usually gets mass market penetration. But I am happy that massive storage niche tech is still there.

          • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            True. 12h to write the whole 18TB makes it a bit impractical for stuff other than backups. ;)

            • OpenStars@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Well, I imagine the write-once, re-write-never part also may limit its applicability too:-). Then again, for a purpose where the data doesn’t need to be constantly changing, like storing a TV show or movie, possibly even music if someone wants to listen to albums rather than randomized songs, it could offer a lot of practical utility to many people.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        “We can improve him.”

        And I believe tape storage hadn’t even been invented when Watson said that. It may have even been pre-magnetic tape entirely because I believe he said it before a computer was actually invented (unless you count Babbage’s difference engine). It was a prediction of what the world would need if computers existed if I remember correctly.

        • OpenStars@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          And it makes total sense, bc the idea of a “PC” hadn’t been tried yet, bc the technology simply wasn’t yet up to the task. And yeah I think I remember the same thing about that quote, though who knows:-P.

          Anyway, it was hard for computers to be wrong about simple arithmetic operations, but they’ve come a long way since then, and AIs are now wrong more often than not.