• 133arc585@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get what you’re saying, but it’s not just monetary efficiency that I meant there. It’s fuel/emissions efficiency that would suffer as well. And that should be of concern to everyone.

      • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right, the transatlantic train should be good enough for anyone. Who needs planes when a train gets you across the ocean with much less pollution!

        No need to be aggressive mate. Your replies are rather antagonistic.

        • buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Aggressive would be shooting down jets until everybody stops flying on fossil fuels, which would be good to do by the way