• huginn
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I get it: but that’s a minority opinion unfortunately.

      Proof of personhood will be a major requirement in the future. Age verification will only be part of the combat against llm chat bots and malicious actors.

      If the government is going to do it eventually we might as well weigh in on the right way to do it. As private and easy as possible.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Or we could just emphatically say no. Do you think governments exist in a vacuum? They exist to serve the peoples interests, not the other way around.

        • huginn
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Of course they don’t.

          But you have to contend with the fact that the overwhelming majority of people are apathetic or in favor of these kind of measures.

          The morality police of the Christian right are campaigning for this. Many moderates don’t care.

          If it’s coming, and it is, we should be sure to be part of a solution that makes it at least somewhat private.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            But you have to contend with the fact that the overwhelming majority of people are apathetic or in favor of these kind of measures.

            That’s not even true.