• Shimitar
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sysvinit on gentoo here. Its so simple and clean, all can be managed and hacked via bash scripts.

    I see no benefits in my use cases for systemd. Boot speed is unneeded, service auto-restart is done via Monit, anything else I don’t need.

    This is true for all my server -and- all my workstations and laptops as well.

    Systemd never solved a problem needed to be solved to start with.

    Now that it also does coffee and cream for you, i start seeing some benefits like auto-restart services. Was it worthwhile? Meh, dunno.

    At first it seemed another case of “I am too young and I want stuff done my way just because” and redhat shoved it down everybody throath to gain marked dominance. That they did.

    At least now systemd looks like mature and finally start making sense. I was even contemplating testing a migration on one server.

    Then I remembered, I like freedom of choice and keeping up being an old fart, so I didn’t (yet).

    (No, for Wayland and network manager I think they are both welcome and needed from the start).

    It didn’t help the main Dev suckass attitude, that didn’t made friends.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Sysvinit on gentoo here.

      Wow. I still use OpenRC. Well, gentoo out of box uses SysV AND OpenRC, but sysv only? Damn.

      and network manager

      Also ew. I use dhcpcd and happy with it.