• Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      How many more concurrent wars do we need before we call it ww3? Some would argue we are already in ww3.

        • Coreidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Technically only US is a superpower. China isn’t quite there yet.

          We can be in ww3 without US being involved.

          • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’d argue that China has achieved superpower status at this point. But I agree with you that there could be a third world war without the US, just like last time. However, it’d be difficult to have such a war without a superpower. Last time, we had a few more of those.

            • raktheundead@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think the PRC lacks something in the soft power stakes; they’ve created some degree of good will outside the West, but they suck at projecting cultural output that doesn’t stem from the imperial Chinese era.