• db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Monarchy always triumphed over democracy until it didn’t. Slavery always triumphed over abolition until it didn’t.

    • huginn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      But none of those triumphs were inevitable.

      It’s nice to think they were: I’d rather live in a world without slavery and with democracy but there was no guarantee of success except the fact that in hindsight it was successful.

      Not all forms of government have won out. Nor will all possible forms of government succeed.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, but looking forward from their end, with your perspective, none of them were possible. My point is that it’s fallacious to claim that just because it hasn’t succeed yet, it can’t succeed.

        • huginn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Remains to be seen if anarchism can ever win though.

          Statist forces have always triumphed.

          Nowhere does this preclude future victory: this is an accurate representation of the current state of affairs. Anarchy has 0 victories and it remains to be seen if there will be any.

          Until 1783 Democracy had no modern victories either, and it very much remained to be seen if it would.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Make a point. Don’t make me assume what your point is and then just restate random facts still without making a point.

            • huginn
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              My point is and always has been the same: we don’t and can’t know if Anarchism will win out against statist forces or not. All we know is that it never has.

              If you’re expecting a more polemic argument about Anarchism Bad or something you won’t find it. I wasn’t here to debate anarchism: just to add a caveat.

              • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                I mean your argument boils down to “we can’t see the futurere” to which I can only answer “well duh”. There’s nothing there.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Now we’re just waiting to see if anarchism will have that moment where they’ll triumph.