The global spread of the Indo-european language family

@mapporn

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m guessing, it doesn’t list the colonizers there, because in terms of numbers, they’re irrelevant…

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes, let’s ignore the whole of the Americas and Australia.

        Lots of people in African ex colonies are native speakers of Portuguese and French. I presume this was already the case in 1950.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Then I guess, I was guessing wrong? I’m not trying to claim anything and I did specify “there”, because I did notice the Americas and Australia. I assumed, the definition of “native speaker” was maybe a bit special here…

            • Ephera@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              My thinking was that South Africa might have had more immigrants from Europe and such than e.g. Congo. At least, I believe, South Africa is particularly known for having many white folks there. But yeah, I’m also just spitballing…