Horrible voter outreach.

  • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Enjoy while you can. Places like California are cracking down on unsolicited pics like that. No matter what we feel about unsolicited political texts (I can’t unsubscribe, can you?), we can’t send shit like that back without getting sued.

    I’ve changed it up and ask them to bring ductape, hacksaws and some stretch and Flex hefty bags. We’ve got a body to dispose of.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      TIL!

      depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and that, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

      Gotta ask their lawyer about artistic political furry porn

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, all my replies are “art”, not just two people banging. I mean, they are still banging, but it’s drawn. Lewdly, and in detail. But artistically.

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        What if we send pics of Manet’s Olympia? That painting was considered scandalous in its time, but it’s classified as fine art now.

        Or sending classical nude figures, or kouros figures(ancient Greek sculptures of nude men.) That could be fun, and confusing.

      • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So how does this differ from sending unsolicited dick pics? Do people have a right to express their penises via text?