realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 months agoNon-binarylemmy.worldimagemessage-square210fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down1107
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageNon-binarylemmy.worldrealitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square210fedilink
minus-squarestanleytweedle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up64arrow-down1·7 months agoFeel like there’s a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up38·7 months agoDoes the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·7 months agoA bit can have two states: true or false. Additionally, the bit can be disabled altogether (null).
Feel like there’s a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.
Does the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.
No, it’s only Russell’s question.
A bit can have two states:
trueorfalse. Additionally, the bit can be disabled altogether (null).