• Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    There is a big delta between the marketing and hype (that they started almost a year before release) and the actual results.

    This was to be expected though, it was clear that they were notably malicious in their PR strategy.

    For example, the first geekbench 6 results that they posted were completely disconnected from reality:

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/3326083

    3,233 ST / 16,947 MT; seems to be running on 100% fans, on the power cord and running some custom, internal build of linux.

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Was that result for this SKU or the higher ones? I think there are supposed to be two other versions that clock a bit higher, which will likely reduce battery life though.

      But you are right the hype cycle was extremely long and doesn’t really mesh with the middling results.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        This a lower end X Elite (their intro series is called X Plus), so yes it doesn’t clock as high as the top end X Elite SKU.