• aidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Life is not naturally easy- it is only because of the labor of others that life is anywhere near as comfortable as it is now.

    • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      We have the means to make a fair and equitable society with minimal crime and no hunger. We, as a society, choose not to. We choose the hard life for the sake of getting everything we worked for to ourselves at the risk of losing it all with one bad day. That’s not comfortable. The labour of all should benefit all so that everyone can have an easy and comfortable life.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      life can be easy for everyone if we all chip in a little, it’s the whole basis of society, we just can’t afford the hoarding aristocracy

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Serious question: do you think the “aristocracy” has like, vaults full of money? Like you think Jeff Bezos has billions of dollars sitting in his bank account? Or a literal vault?

        Because that is definitely not how rich people actually live. As a rule, they have very little liquidity as a percent of their net worth.

        • biddy@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          What does that have to do with anything? Just because the wealth is on paper doesn’t make it any less real.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It matters because people suggest that Bezos et al “hoard wealth” which is both untrue and impossible with the way their wealth is calculated.

            • biddy@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              But they are totally hoarding their on paper wealth. It’s impossible to end up with $200 billion without intentionally hoarding it.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s not true at all. Bezos, for instance, is worth so much solely because Amazon is worth so much. It has nothing to do with his personal spending habits whatsoever.

                • biddy@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Bezos is the CEO of Amazon, he can definitely take some of the credit/blame that it’s worth so much and that he has such a large stake. He could cash out at any point, but he chooses not to, aka hoarding.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    … what exactly do you think would happen to Amazon’s stock value if Bezos cashed out?

                    And how exactly is owning a company “hoarding”