• FirstPitchStrike@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think it’s the fact that furries tend to bring their kink public. I have not consented to engage in your sex games. If he showed up to a ceremony in leather and a ballgag no one would be ok with it, but the fur suit is the equivalent and I’m expected to applaud.

    • Serinus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      the fur suit is the equivalent [of] leather and a ballgag

      I mean, no. It’s really not.

      I do get what you’re saying and generally agree otherwise. That one was just a bit much.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree. I’ve seen furries in public and while I find them odd, I never saw any of their costumes as inherently sexual.

          • yuriy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            except they don’t though, where are you coming up with this?

            say someone is attracted to women, right? is every female body they see gonna be viewed exclusively through a sexual lens?

            some people get kinky with ropes, are those inherently sexual too? where’s the line?

    • Jimbo@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fursuit is the equivalent??? I’m actually laughing rn people think this???

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      You sound like the kind of person that wants to ban drag story time at the libraries because “kids shouldn’t be exposed to someone’s kink”

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So the distinction I feel here is that women are people. If a man wants to dress like a woman, sure, most people can interact with women in public, whatever. If you want to call them both, broadly, a form of cosplay, then drag is a costume that doesn’t fundamentally change much. Animals aren’t people.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, Halloween is explicitly a cosplay event which subverts social norms. I think it’s pretty disingenuous to conflate Halloween with typical daily interaction

            • yuriy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              furry meet ups are explicitly a cosplay event which subverts social norms. i think it’s pretty disingenuous to conflate people with hobbies with sexual deviants.

    • Madeline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A big part of this misconception is actually from That Episode. You can actually google the phrase That Episode. No need to even specify the show, just those two words are enough (but the show is CSI). There’s a bunch to read into if you’d like, but the important bit is that a big part of public opinion - which has only recently begun to change, and only in some parts of the internet - comes from That Episode’s portrayal of furries

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean if someone gets off by not hurting or interacting with you then your consent isn’t important. What happens in someone else’s head is theirs. How they act toward others is important. Feel free to be skeeved out, tho.

    • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would you say the same about police officers, nurses, nuns, motorcycle wear and so on?

      If the body isnt indecently exposed i find it hard to draw the line, since everything and nothing is someones kink.

        • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          We established that there is sexual and non sexual furries. As each of my examples is both non sexual and sexual for some people, it is impossible to deem the one as right and the other as wrong on that basis.

          Interestingly it is you, that seems to consider animal suits and behaviour as a sex thing. So maybe you need to own up to your kinks you little furry.