Godric@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agoClose but no Cigar!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1206arrow-down115
arrow-up1191arrow-down1imageClose but no Cigar!lemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down5·1 year agoYou should probably look up what Trujillo got up to, since you admit some actions justify intervention. Like, for example, a CIA sponsored coup and assassination. But obviously they’re the good guys, right?
minus-squareMatch!!@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoi don’t know if this is a hot take but assassinations are better than invasions
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoUnless the assassination, for random example, starts a civil war, because the people the imperial power wanted in charge ended up not having enough support to stay in charge. Or if it starts WW1.
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoNo, the CIA are not the “good guys”, why would you say that?
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoNaked sarcasm
You should probably look up what Trujillo got up to, since you admit some actions justify intervention.
Like, for example, a CIA sponsored coup and assassination. But obviously they’re the good guys, right?
i don’t know if this is a hot take but assassinations are better than invasions
Unless the assassination, for random example, starts a civil war, because the people the imperial power wanted in charge ended up not having enough support to stay in charge.
Or if it starts WW1.
No, the CIA are not the “good guys”, why would you say that?
Naked sarcasm