• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle



  • Boomers say that because historically, with increasing age people usually also managed to have some things they might want to conserve, like a home and some financial assets to cover their retirement. I’m in my mid thirties and the only feasible way for me to ever own a home is inheriting one. My retirement plan is to die in the revolution. I have nothing to be conservative about


  • Boomers say that because historically, with increasing age people usually also managed to have some things they might want to conserve, like a home and some financial assets to cover their retirement. I’m in my mid thirties and the only feasible way for me to ever own a home is inheriting one. My retirement plan is to die in the revolution. I have nothing to be conservative about


  • It is mostly serious. There is plenty of scientific evidence on how car centric infrastructure, city planning and policies have destroyed walkable cities and require an in proportion extreme amount of space and accommodations. Cars as a means of transportation are wholly inefficient, you could put several dozen daily commuters into a single bus, multiple times that in a single subway train.

    The only space where cars are not short term replaceable to great improvement of the general habitability of the area is in rural regions where distances are huge, people are spread out widely and communal infrastructure is simply too inflexible to accommodate the needs of the citizens.





  • Wouldn’t you say the second season was a take on bringing real world problems into Star Trek context? The dystopia reality is an authoritarian regime founded on racism, and the planet is dying from ignored climate change, only barely being held together by essentially giant force fields in the sky.

    If anything I found it a bit too on the nose for Trek, though that impression might be colored by this being the first real life issue of my time that is a topic in Trek. When old Trek shows aired the first time I was just a little kid and missed most of those; so I can’t relate as much.


  • My biggest gripe is that the all feed is not actually the all feed from across the fediverse, but a feed from all instances your instance is federated with. I understand why that is the case, but the fediverse really lacks a way to explore beyond your walled garden and its natural bias. Essentially this acts a mandatory content filter that I have not set up or opted in to, which I personally object to. I have the tools to show and hide what content I want to see, I don’t need it pre selected for me. Or at least give the the additional option to see a feed of all instances and communities across Lemmy / the fediverse I have not personally blocked or filtered out.



  • First place must be Control Priest. I know it is irreplaceable class identity at this point but it is firmly not fun to fight a deck that has copying (or even stealing) your own cards as a win condition, and besides that does not much but drawing cards and clearing the board two dozen times. If I play any kind of control deck I concede right there because it is an auto loss against my own stuff.

    I also hate playing against enrage warrior, getting killed in two turns by a 30 attack remornia feels unavoidable.





  • Interesting background knowledge that they were supposed to be gay, puts a lot of things into new perspective.

    That being said, I don’t really like the idea, I enjoyed them as these unlikely but good platonic friends. I don’t think adding a romantic aspect to them would have improved their characters. For example Garak has many traits that could be interpreted as stereotypically gay, especially within the time period the show was produced. Him being a flamboyant and well spoken heterosexual works better to subvert cliches. Come to think of it, Bashir also isn’t the manliest of men. Which i also find more interesting for a heterosexual character.



  • Das wird mit Sicherheit die Absicht dahinter sein. Genau wie beim Stütze beziehen, der Staat weiß doch bereits dass derjenige arbeitslos ist, und wenn derjenige das Geld nicht mehr braucht weil er nun Einkommen hat, wird er sich schon melden um nicht massive Bußgelder wegen erschleichen von Leistungen und / oder Steuerbetrug abzubekommen.

    Stattdessen muss man als Betroffener alle paar Monate den Antrag erneuern, die Bedürftigkeit nachweisen, und durch all die Reifen springen die man so vorgesetzt bekommt, ganz zu schweigen von der Idee diese ganze Bürokratie durch ein BGE zu ersetzen und die Beamten stattdessen steuern fahnden zu lassen. Alles mit dem Hintergedanken dass dann weniger Leute die Sozialleistungen in Anspruch nehmen.

    Deutsche Effizienz in Aktion