Gucci_Minh [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 4 年前
cake
Cake day: 2020年12月23日

help-circle






  • Gucci_Minh [he/him]@hexbear.nettomemes@hexbear.netChallenged
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    3 个月前

    It’s near impossible for modern MBT armour to stop a good hit from an equally modern ATGM or APFSDS round. The best way to survive is to not get spotted and hit in the first place. That’s why Soviet doctrine had it right, quick low profile tanks with “decent enough” armour. Hard and soft kill APS can help with RPGs and ATGMs but after seeing how the Trophy system of the IOF is absolute dogshit I don’t think it’ll be enough.

    I think if natoids wanted an effective combat platform over grifting money, they would develop a tank with good all around protection against autocannons, but just enough armour on the frontal arc to get lucky vs dedicated anti tank weapons. If you have a 70 ton tank that gets penetrated by Kornets, might as well make a 50 ton tank that gets penetrated by Kornets instead and can actually cross bridges.




  • Gucci_Minh [he/him]@hexbear.nettoMemes@lemmygrad.mlChinese Economy Collapsing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 个月前

    If China can manage to turn its industries and markets to an internal production/consumption model and reduce its reliance on being an export economy, it would be much better off even without the massive growth. Growth will have to stop at some point, and the focus will be on stability, since China hasn’t made any indications it’ll try to fuel growth through imperialism like western economies have. Japan style stagnation would be not so terrible if your society is socialist.