Judge_Jury [comrade/them, he/him]

  • 1 Post
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle








  • So in the moral system you’re proposing, it would be an offense to use those buildings without their owner’s permission. The fact that people denied access to those buildings will die as a result, though, is just a part of nature

    So, why would you expect a perspective which values property more than people to stir anyone’s moral feeling? If you don’t expect that, then why are you bothering to frame it in terms of right and wrong?





  • Hah, yeah that’s my goal too. I spent about a decade trying to get through to people in my life on a basis of common ground. Never saw a single bit of improvement, although that’s possibly influenced by an overwhelmingly reactionary local culture

    Eventually I started taking an antidepressant, and suddenly I couldn’t tolerate their shit anymore without a huge amount of effort. Now they don’t listen to what I shout any more than they used to listen to what I said, but they’re more careful to avoid getting my attention with their bigotry. Meanwhile, I’ve seen a couple of apparent ‘apoliticals’ who seemed to find something satisfying in righteous anger.

    They’ll probably quiet their minds and log back into /r/RickyMorty or whatever, but who knows, maybe someone’s interest will be piqued by hearing a regular person actually give a shit





  • Pretty much anti-interventionism. Personally I like to educate the people around me on the ways that the US has been explicitly evil from its inception, and to use context to derail hatefests against our targets, but I don’t think either of those really qualifies as meaningful support.

    On a personal level, what I mean by support is mainly internal. It affects how we approach certain issues - especially calls for intervention - but it isn’t a form of aid. The issue of support is much more material between nations, but for us to have any personal say in that we’d have to gain control


  • I think one major aspect is that even if their leadership was 100% cynically lying about their intention to build socialism in China, they’ve still been a tremendously less evil superpower than any of their peers.

    Here in the US, we started with white supremacist genocides and have continued that tradition up to the present. Domestically we run a perpetual military counterinsurgency campaign against our population, and internationally we drop countless bombs on countries we “aren’t” at war with while we coup their elected leaders and train torturers and death squads for our puppet regimes. Western international “development” programs have been nakedly exploitative and repressive, while Chinese international development programs have instead been mutually beneficial

    All of this happens in public view, and the worst allegations anyone can make up against China always both pale in comparison to what the US admits to doing and get retracted after a few months of our Reputable Journalistic Institutions lying about them


  • The AE in AES can work a couple of different ways. If the question is, “What would allow rigidly defined Socialism to exist,” then the answer is usually confined to history or speculation. If the question is, “Which extant states best represent an effort to dismantle capitalism,” then I’d generally say it’s the usual ones that identify as Socialist - China being the only superpower among them.

    If we broaden the question out past AES to, “Which political efforts deserve support,” then virtually any enemy of NATO can qualify. Sure, a multipolar capitalist order won’t guarantee the end of capitalism, but destroying western hegemony is absolutely a prerequisite for it and pessimism on that front is needlesly tiring