We really need tags on Lemmy, so I can easily find and re-read all of these captain’s jokes comics, once in a while~

Great job, as usual!

The big problem is that we have long stepped over that line.

Now even when you pay you are still shown ads (maybe, but not surely, not-targeted) and your data is still scrapped and analyzed to hell and back.

I would personally prefer to not have AI Generated photo realistic content that can easily be mistaken for real photo in this community.

At the same time its very nature makes it really hard to moderate and control, and can easily spiral into witch hunts or limiting the content from only an handful of trusted sources, which would kill the already limited contributions outside of the ones from the wonderful anon.

The only solution I can think of is adding a vague rule, as someone already posted, asking to avoid it and be lenient on the casual trasgressors, asking, educating and warning first. Not straight out banning or demeaning.

At the same time I feel there should be low tolerance towards the amount of vulgar, harsh and honestly disheartening comments that tend to flood discussions even vaguely related to AI on lemmy. There’s a really vocal group of people that floods any thread that could potentially be AI or about AI.

I get the reaction, but I think it has no place here: this has always been a wholesome, kind, community.

About artsy AI (drawings, comics, fake paintings, digital pieces etc) I don’t really have a strong opinion, mostly because I don’t follow this community for the art but mostly for the photos of real owls: I just think it should at least be properly tagged.

You can leak memory in perfectly safe Rust, because it is not a bug per se, an example is by using Box::leak

Preventing memory leaks was never in the intentions of Rust. What it tries to safeguard you from are Memory Safety bugs like the infamous and common double free.

You could consider a physical donation to the Internet Archive too, which is potentially more useful than a normal library because, as they say and I quote, they “try to digitize materials and make them available publicly as funding allows”.

More info here: https://help.archive.org/help/how-do-i-make-a-physical-donation-to-the-internet-archive/

I don’t have direct experience with RooCode and Cline, but I would be mighty surprised if they work with lesser models of even the old Qwen2-Coder 32B - and even that was mostly misses. I never tried the Qwen3 coder but I assume it is not drastically different.

Those small models are at most useful for some kind of smarter autocomplete, not to run a full tools framework.

BTW you could check out Aider too for a different approach, and they have a lot of benchmarks that can help you get an idea about what’s needed.

You have to wait for the annual reruns, or - if you are on PC - you can use a mod (I think it is this one?) to rerun them offline

I think you mean: certified mail at least 30 days before renewal to cancel, we will answer between 60 to 90 days only if the termination was successful.

Your works are really amazing!

I don’t have them: I generated a new one modifying the prompt

Is this what you meant? If you want it in other styles I can try them out, but it will take some time

EDIT: If it was because I said it was straightforward to gen them in whatever style, it is because of the dataset Chroma used for training: I would be incredibly surprised if centaurs aren’t in there

Sorry about the confusion

Using Chroma (v50 annealed GGUF Q4) it was pretty straightforward to get a centaur in whichever style, so I tried to make something weirder, making the head a completely different style from the rest of the image.

It was kind of a PITA to get something somewhat coherent and not messed up, but I think with enough prompt massaging it could output something really nice, but I don’t have the hardware to experiment too much: it just takes too long to gen.
Still, it was fun.

This, plus the recent ‘pay or consent’ fiasco, makes pretty clear they are going straight for a deliberate collision route with the EU.

I assume they got some kind of political backing for it, it’s a quite sudden all in. Sigh.

EDIT: Wrong link

It is even the Gold edition! The emperor would be proud.

50501 (short for “50 protests, 50 states, 1 movement”) is an American progressivist grassroots political organization founded to protest the policies and actions of the second Donald Trump administration in the United States.

From wikipedia

The parade I assume is in reference to the birthday military parade for the 250th Army Anniversary of June 14, 2025. More here: wikipedia

Copy pasting from another community.

To make it easier:

Polly [:polly]
Comment 21 • 4 hours ago

As discussed on the attached patch, it doesn't sound like unified push is a direction we want to go in at the moment.
So i'm going to close the bug, but do appreciate the interesting exploration and discussion it has generated.
Thank you to everyone who contributed thoughts, time and code to this issue!
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 hours ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX

The comment that was being referenced (I think):

pollymce requested changes to this revision.Fri, Jun 27, 11:17 AM
pollymce added a subscriber: pollymce.
Comment Actions

hello - thank you for looking into this and submitting this patch stack!
I have asked around a few people internally but unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a lot of support for the idea of moving to Unified Push.
So I think it would be best to abandon the stack rather than spend more time working on this implementation.
Sorry to have to say that and sorry it's taken so long to get back to you with this message!
We appreciate your time and effort here and hope that you will still consider contributing to firefox in the future.

To make it easier:

Polly [:polly]
Comment 21 • 4 hours ago

As discussed on the attached patch, it doesn't sound like unified push is a direction we want to go in at the moment.
So i'm going to close the bug, but do appreciate the interesting exploration and discussion it has generated.
Thank you to everyone who contributed thoughts, time and code to this issue!
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 hours ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX

The comment that was being referenced (I think):

pollymce requested changes to this revision.Fri, Jun 27, 11:17 AM
pollymce added a subscriber: pollymce.
Comment Actions

hello - thank you for looking into this and submitting this patch stack!
I have asked around a few people internally but unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a lot of support for the idea of moving to Unified Push.
So I think it would be best to abandon the stack rather than spend more time working on this implementation.
Sorry to have to say that and sorry it's taken so long to get back to you with this message!
We appreciate your time and effort here and hope that you will still consider contributing to firefox in the future.

EDIT: Copy pasted the text for accessibility

O’Brien hitting us with those hard truths

This is a nice looking one, I really enjoy the colors, any info about the model, prompt, lora?

This is a crossover I’d love to see!

You could try asking in !caffeitalia@feddit.it too, feddit.it is an italian speaking instance