c/Superbowl

For all your owl related needs!

  • 826 Posts
  • 3.77K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle
  • I was raised with Republican beliefs, but got off that train during the 2nd GWB admin. The times were there were any middle ground to find between mixed political couples is long gone. When the only topics anyone spends time debating are morality, religion, and discrimination, what middle ground can exist? Facts don’t weigh into debates for Republicans anymore. They have chosen feelings in the face of data. They choose to knowingly follow ignorance. It becomes a zero-sum game, where they either wear you down into going along with them, or they get ignored and cut off.

    Being open to others’ opinions, experiences, and education helped me to see a different world view, but it didn’t seem so frowned upon back then. But now the desire to get rid of the Board of Education, promote a purposefully biased curriculum, and treated the educated as an enemy, I don’t know how people are supposed to get shown a different truth than what they have been indoctrinated into.


  • After reading this comment and the article, I feel there is actually some perspective hidden here that may need addressing.

    While a million dollars to most of us seems unobtainable, a billion dollars is still unobtainable to most millionaires. It’s 1000x or 3 factors of 10 or however you wish to look at it. Huge difference. Nobody if offered either a million or a billion dollars would say there’s no substantial difference.

    Google tells me Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield are worth about $150 million each. That’s a hell of a lot of money to be sure.

    Current market cap on Unilever is around $144 billion. One thousand times more than either Ben or Jerry.

    When we’re in a time where some are starting to say even a million dollars is no longer a guaranteed good retirement savings, and when people with 150x that much are being silenced, maybe we also need to update our thoughts on the ongoing class warfare around the world.

    While most of us here have different realities than Ben and Jerry, their lives are drifting closer to ours than they are for the billionaire class. To me, that is a bit scary to think of. That’s concentration of power to a much smaller group. About 1.1% of the world population, 59.4 million people, are millionaires, there are less than 3000 billionaires.

    When division is what is keeping us fighting each other instead of focusing on who is really calling the shots, I feel this is an important distinction to consider. Maybe getting pissed at millionaires has now become futile. The upside is it is easier to focus on 3000 people than 60 million. That isnt to say millionaires are also an issue, but it may no longer be the most pressing one.

    Open to your thoughts, I just think these numbers are pretty staggering.


  • Honestly, just an oversight on my part due to having his work recommended to me by the algorithm. The main things I’m subscribed to are recues and rehabs, and then every day I sort through a dozen or so pages pushing AI art as real animals, but occasionally I come across things that repeatedly show real images. The only things that had been showing up on my feed is the real guy’s work, and that lead me to assume it was his page since everything I’ve noticed from it had the same watermark and hashtag listings.

    Now that you pointed it out, I checked out the actual educationbooks and Simon’s page, and it turns out owls are the minority of content on both. If it pops up in the future, I’ll see if I can image search it back to the original post instead. I’ve gone and fixed this one now.

    I appreciate anyone that has reason to correct me. I want to do the best I can for you all and also the ones creating all the content we enjoy.









  • anon6789@lemmy.worldOPtoSuperbowl@lemmy.worldZooooooom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I loved finding this set. Even when most of these guys share what they call uncropped photos, it still looks like you’re standing within spitting distance of the subject. This is one of the few that actually feels like it gives an idea how hard it is to see and photograph these owls.


  • anon6789@lemmy.worldOPtoSuperbowl@lemmy.worldZooooooom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I don’t know much camera tech, but I assumed it had to be full of compromises after looking at it and doing a quick read. I was shocked it was a Point and Shoor first of all, and then seeing the price I knew it was a too good to be true thing. It’s cheaper than many of the lenses I’ve seen with less power and it’s smaller so I figured corners were cut somewhere.

    One review I read said they were a limited run, but still took a few years to sell out, so I figured it was something very niche, as only so many people want a $1000+ camera with a fixed lens or various things along that line. It’s very interesting to see such a weird hybrid of a camera though, even if I couldnt fully understand why it was so weird.



  • In 3 months we’re going to have a Secretary of Defense that’s on the Fox and Friends B-Team, and a panel of MAGA generals purging the ranks. I am not ruling anything out of the future timeline we’re on…

    These are some of the same people who don’t know who the president of Puerto Rico is, so they might just move in thinking the place is abandoned.


  • anon6789@lemmy.worldOPtoSuperbowl@lemmy.worldZooooooom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Some will either still say it’s not enough or that their iPhone is just as good. 😆

    I watched a few zoom tests of the camera and it’s pretty crazy. It looks to have been a limited run and then discontinued when stock ran out, but it’s much cheaper than I would have guessed based on looking up some of the other mega jumbo telephoto lenses these people mention.





  • Found an article about ethical animal photography and how harmless activities can hurt or get animals killed. Here is an owl story from it:

    Close to where I live, little owls breed (Athena noctua). Although their status is of the least concern worldwide, their numbers are declining rapidly here in the UK, probably because of intensive farming methods and the shocking loss of invertebrates and small mammals on which they feed. Just 7% of Britain’s native woodlands, where they live, are in good condition ecologically. It’s not the photographers’ fault that they are disappearing.

    They live on inaccessible private land. Consequently, wildlife photographers entice them by baiting them with mealworms on a boundary fence post. This might seem harmless. After all, they are feeding the birds. However, the fence post is by a road, which increases the risk of the owls being hit by a vehicle; one of them has been. Furthermore, the post is also in the open, making these tiny birds more likely to be predated. As the owls regularly visit the same spot to get food, so too will the bigger hunters that will see the tiny owls as easy meals.

    I also always think of Mao and the sparrows. Four Pests Campaign I was going to post some quotes, but after reading them, I decided not to. I’ll simplify it into saying one of the things they did was to purposefully make noise and just disturb the birds in general so they couldn’t rest or eat. About 4 million sparrows were killed. The end result of that misguided effort was a famine that killed 20-30 million people, so it worked out for either side.

    Birds live in a very delicate balance. They’ve given up many physical advantages we take for granted to be able to fly. As long as the balance is kept, they do fine. But when their life revolves around flight, and they can no longer maintain the energy needed to fly, they are done for. Energy needs are so high for them.