This reads like the Hiss incantation

I use STube (SmartTube) and it’s pretty good. It has ad blocking, integrated sponsorblock, various amenities, and support for casting. I think it also works without logging in.

I am not sure if it works on any Android tv or just on Amazon firestick, but the stick is its primary target. You may need to stick to the beta, as google gets more aggressive with ad blocking, it’s updated pretty often.

Don’t bother with an RPi, it will cost more troubleshooting than it’s worth (in this usecase).

Rdna 3 is AMD’s previous generation. This card has the same chip as an RX 7900 xtx, actually you could say it’s the workstation version of that, like a Quadro RTX 6000 and a GeForce RTX 2080ti.

pure unfiltered Frutiger juice

Cookie Clicker flashbacks coming in

https://youtu.be/aTf7DWpyJBY you can see one being operated in this educational video

When the chapta is just a checkbox it means that chrome/safari has already ratted you out as a human long before.

They do also check mouse movements and the likes, tho. They also check how quick you are to answer

You are missing the point. They care when money is involved, and yet they failed to maintain a browser engine, which would have (for the better or for the worse) a central part of most people’s computing.

And yet, despite the browser being so important… They gave up and handed the cake to Google.

LMAO

Microsoft pays for a lot of opensource development, you may not like it but you still need its work, including Lennart Pottering’s salary (and don’t even start with “systemd bad”).

“Hyperv is the worst”… Shut up and come back when your hypervisor has proper GPU paravirtualization on all vendors.

Bad argument, Microsoft is among the three most valuable companies in the world, when something is important to them they get it done properly (e.g. hyperv is the best made part of windows, because they need it for azure). The settings page doesn’t get them money, only nerds care if it’s bad, a browser does.

Maybe if all the forks merge into a single project, and if that project becomes part of some foundation like the Linux foundation or most likely freedesktop, and if some folks from big tech companies get paid to work on it full time (probably google would, for obvious reasons, but it wouldn’t be enough), and if distros start shipping that in place of firefox, and if for some reason the less tech savvy get to know about this project…

…Then if all of that happens, forks might have a chance of still existing.

This is how most big open source projects (like Linux, gnome, mesa, etc) thrive. With the catch that while most tech companies have some stake in Linux and friends, no company other than google has any stake in Firefox existing.

They die. Full stop.

Not even Microsoft had the strength to maintain a browser engine, that’s why they moved Edge to Chromium, they gave up.

Green. I often have the same argument about my jacket

Wait, I had “night light” on. It’s blue.

Try this with our friend.

I pay 7€/month for mobile Internet (80 GB LTE) and 16€/month for home (5gbps fiber).

The 16€ a month is because I have the same ISP on mobile and home, but even without it, in Italy fiber comes at around 25€/month sometimes 20 sometimes 30

Ah, it wasn’t my comment, I don’t have opinions on that. I just wanted to bitch about the idea of opinions being inherently correct

So polite

He’s referring to the guy defending the CEOs. He’s defending them to not let them play the victim

It’s not like Yellowstone is the only supervolcano anyway 🤷‍♀️

Do people’s legs really bend that way?

in which universe 75+25=110

My bad, I meant the 75+35=100 thing, which is a common mistake people make when doing brain math. Just imagine I said 35 in the thread.

Back to the topic. “Who decides…” I clearly said some opinions are neither right nor wrong, if something is subjective, it by definition is neither right nor wrong. “No law to force/prohibit” I also specifically said you are entitled to have wrong opinions, so we can ignore the entire “forcing/prohibiting” conundrum.

Next paragraph. “… These are facts that can be true or wrong” exactly, and when I say “in my opinion <fact> is true” this is also a fact (a true one) in which I say “<fact> is true” is my opinion, but if “<fact>” is actually false, this is a wrong opinion that I shouldn’t have.

An opinion is a fact you believe is true. But some facts are false and it’s wrong to believe they are true. “Your opinion is wrong” does not mean that “it’s false that you have that opinion”. Not every opinion can be just wrong or right, as I said multiple times.