What a sociopathic ideology.

This one was actually really hard to track down, but I finally found the creator and the original

https://imginn.com/p/ByLQdBEJkX8/

If you want to spend the time and effort to practice that technique, go for it. But the benefits don’t really make it worth it for most people.

into the habit of a good technique means you’ll be fine even when you’re tired or distracted

The technique described in the image is not the only “good technique”. A person could reasonably develop their own “good technique” simply by being cognizant of their cutting.

Since this image is low quality or possibly someone tried to hide the creator’s watermark here is the
original by @adam.the.creator.

Did you just assume they are actively promoting it as if it has valid medicinal uses?

They make it very clear in multiple places like this:

While there’s no scientific evidence that rose quartz crystals offer any health benefits, they’re still commonly used for healing purposes

This article is actually helping to provide facts about the subject. You should be supportive of this article, not disparaging it.

Fixed link:

https://itswhatimreallythinking.tumblr.com/post/182867027917/my-battery-is-low-and-its-getting-dark-the

I don’t really see a difference. They list the genitals next to toes and feet. The wiki at least describes the concept more simplistically, which I think is the most important aspect.

Original for more pixels

https://upandoutcomic.tumblr.com/post/72500097816/dramaaaaaa-facebook-twitter-up-and-out

The chopping technique is not really that necessary. It’s great for chopping lots of veggies at speed, but if you’re just cutting veggies for a single meal then there’s not that much benefit unless you’re already highly practiced and that’s your default.

What’s far more important is just being cognizant for each cut you make. Walk don’t run.

What’s a “Rusty Venture”?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cortical_homunculus

Not sure, but I was mostly outlining how dumb that person’s argument is.

I wonder if this was how sharks got their skin teeth

I thought that might be what they were saying, but then it would be “with regard to to” so I was unsure.

Initialisms like this bug me because they cause confusion for the most minimal amount of benefit.

“wrt”?

If only OP had linked the original post from the artist, whose name is also in the image.

Not sure what script you’re referring to, but that site doesn’t have opengraph tags. That’s what tells 3rd party apps/sites how what to show as a sort of preview. Either that, or Lemmy might use oembed for it. I’ve never dived that deep into Lemmy’s code.