• 5 Posts
  • 60 Comments
Joined 3 days ago
cake
Cake day: October 23rd, 2024

help-circle










  • Complete utter BS headline.

    DPRK getting stronger is a natural effect of US demonic hegemony. And China does not see DPRK getting funding for Russian support as a threat to China. DPRK being a nuclear proxy on US and colonies is an asset to rest of “genuinely free”/multipolar world.

    There are no Chinese officials rebuking DPRK quoted.

    and that really, in many ways, supplants China as North Korea’s most important protector.”

    Pure projection statements for EU’s colonial status and their acceptance of Nordstream sabotage. China’s support of DPRK is a humanitarian expense. The whole article is reminiscent of BS that Russia and China are deep rivals and hate each other, even as stupidity drives them into very close allies. That DPRK is/gets supported by Russia is no threat to China whatsoever.

    Ian Bremer comments are pure worthlessness as well. China’s peace plan for Ukraine is the same as Russia’s.




  • It definitely is not a sign of a healthy economy. It is a measure to keep ruble high, and encourage people to save their rubles.

    Russian economic growth, mostly due to military production spending, has been higher than western countries, even in USD terms because of this interest rate policy to keep ruble high, and the massive war economy.

    While US/Ukraine is 100% responsible for war, there are also Russian elites (like US, the weapons and oil sectors) getting rich from it. As long as Russia eventually wins, this becomes an acceptable theater for them. A war on Iran is also likely seen as a profit opportunity for Russia, instead of something to prevent by say, sinking US aircraft carrier fleets with nukes.

    Every Russian that wants a job has a job, and so that is more important for “stability” than unaffordable new mortgages.


  • point 1 - stop being brainwashed into Russia/Putin being your enemy. Your survival depends on it, as patience on nuclear strikes on the US is only due to certainty of eventual victory for Russia in Ukraine. Ukraine proxy war on Russia is just yet another ploy to boost military and oil profits. US always loses wars, because winning means an early end to war. Pathethic loser public that supports wars, especially on Russia, is pathetic losers not realizing the expense and decline/collapse it causes the US.

    1. Why would media know this when US government doesn’t? Biden’s political decision to not put Trump in military jail, or charge Musk if actual evidence of wrongdoing is zionist first rulership if true. Musk did report not wanting to turn on Starlink over Russian Crimea because it could cause nuclear strikes on US, and US policy is to not permit starlink over Russia. If Putin advised him to ignore Ukrainian request in conformance to US policy, then this is a non issue.

    Btw, Musk is only US oligarch to donate anything free to Ukraine. He gave them free starlink before getting pentagon paid oversight.

    Even if he is a Trump financing/endorsing POS, this is still a smear campaign, which on the outside chance of being true, is a Biden government endorsement to not prosecute for zionist maximalist election outcome.



  • H2 only FC ebikes are not well developed or popular yet. Drones with FCs are actively developed as density/weight is a huge factor for range. Very small fuel cells, 500w or 1000w have applications in powering a home (with solar supplement) because they can run 24/7 and charge batteries. Hooking up torches or burners to these cannisters can also provide clean indoor cooking or heating a box of sand/water in a room.

    For an ebike, it is touring/camping applications that this really enables. Charging a battery when you need extended range, and it becomes worth the extra weight. Even a 100w fuel cell slow charging a spare battery while riding is big range extension, and provides overnight full charge. Combustion cooking and heating is fine for high supplementary energy.

    A H2 economy would have these cartridges in similar locations to swappable propane tanks.

    Now they just need to solve the energy consumption and cost parity questions surrounding green hydrogen.

    Toyota research and products are ahead of their time relative to cheap green H2. This is an advance over using 300bar “paintball tanks” by going to 525bar, and it looks a bit like an apple product design. Needs far more electrolysis production capacity and deployments. The global project pipeline is long though, so we should get there. Current focus is on large scale electrolyzers with specific offtakers which is slow, but a step towards broader distribution.