posthexbearposting [they/them]

Join the IWW

  • 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 15th, 2021

help-circle











  • posthexbearposting [they/them]@hexbear.nettoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlSo, on pronouns.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    How you look doesn’t make you a man. You could literally have all those physical traits and be a woman or non-binary.

    Why is it rude to confirm how you self identify? Is it that horrible being trans or non-binary that people shouldn’t even confirm that you’re cis? How do you think trans people feel when someone assumes their gender based on how they look?

    shitposting

    Wow we got the manliest man man over here! Women love him and he gets all the pussy!


  • seconding this. i started as not caring. realised im non-binary but still don’t really care. pronouns don’t really bother me, as for me, how other people view and refer to me doesn’t really affect my internal feelings on my gender. obviously this isn’t the case for all trans people, some definitely want to be seen and referred to as their self-id gender.


  • posthexbearposting [they/them]@hexbear.nettoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlSo, on pronouns.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    IRL since you are cis and I asume you look masculine there is no need to specify your pronouns.

    I disagree with this. It’s better not to assume or encourage people to assume pronouns. It’s better to use they/them when you’re not sure. Most of the time you can learn people’s pronouns contextually, by hearing how other people refer to them.

    Otherwise, it’s better to use they/them unless you have evidence otherwise. Looks isn’t evidence. It’s not the worst thing to assume once and be wrong, but if you’re aiming for inclusivity it’s better to not assume







  • Cannibalism under extreme scarcity has been a worldwide phenomenon since the dawn of time. Graeber has a chapter on it in debt. Some cultures even had systems where people, usually elderly or disabled people would volunteer themselves. It’s pretty depressing but it also shows the sacrifice that people are willing to make to keep their community alive, and would never happen in today’s individualised alienated capitalist societies. The alternative is the community dying so from a utilitarian perspective it’s an interesting ethical debate. We of course are now well beyond post scarcity, and in the modern day I’d argue for dying while fighting the rich for resources over genociding the elderly and disabled.

    They also display this communal behaviour in Snowpiercer, a communist movie/book/tv, where people would sacrifice their limbs for food to keep others alive and the class struggle going.