• dwindling7373
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not really. If your focus is beyond the next 4 years, you can argue letting Democrats lose is the best strategy to stop wars on the planet down the line.

    In fact if Kamala was going to loose either way (as it happened) it’s a good thing that she lost hard.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Anyone who makes that argument has no idea how bad things can get and how fast.

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            There is at least one camp right now where genocide is happening and the Democrats are supporting and paying for it.

          • dwindling7373
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes?

            So if the camps were happening either way, better not to vote for the guy that says “vote me and the camps will have regulations in regard to human experimentation!” and strictly go for “fuck that shit”.

            I get people still being affected by the election topics, but it’s not now.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Accelerationist arguments always show that the speaker isn’t nearly as smart as they think they are.