CHEF-KOCH to Linux@lemmy.ml • edit-22 years agoFlaptak and Snap are not the futureludocode.commessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down11cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1-1arrow-down1external-linkFlaptak and Snap are not the futureludocode.comCHEF-KOCH to Linux@lemmy.ml • edit-22 years agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
minus-square@pinknoise@lemmy.mllinkfedilink1•2 years agoThey are even worse, since they don’t come with an update mechanism builtin.
minus-square@M500@lemmy.mllinkfedilink1•2 years agoThat’s the main thing I don’t like about app images. It is just like windows where everything needs to be updated independently.
minus-square@M500@lemmy.mllinkfedilink1•2 years agoThat’s the main thing I don’t like about app images. It is just like windows where everything needs to be updated independently.
minus-squarepoVoqlinkfedilink0•2 years agoFlatpacks don’t update themselves either, you need a system service to do that. Something similar exists for Appimages, called AppimageUpdate without requiring an appstore for it.
minus-square@daojones@lemmy.mllinkfedilink1•edit-22 years agoAppImages don’t integrate into the system at all and AppImageUpdate sucks. Also flatpak update go brrrr
deleted by creator
They are even worse, since they don’t come with an update mechanism builtin.
That’s the main thing I don’t like about app images. It is just like windows where everything needs to be updated independently.
That’s the main thing I don’t like about app images. It is just like windows where everything needs to be updated independently.
Flatpacks don’t update themselves either, you need a system service to do that. Something similar exists for Appimages, called AppimageUpdate without requiring an appstore for it.
AppImages don’t integrate into the system at all and AppImageUpdate sucks.
Also
flatpak updatego brrrr