The Pennsylvania senator dismissed the demand for further investigation as “moot.”

Senator John Fetterman appeared not to understand why Democrats want to investigate the deadly strike that killed dozens of Iranian children.

During an interview with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins Wednesday night, Fetterman was asked to explain why he hadn’t signed onto a letter from Senate Democrats that questioned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on the February 28 strike on Shajarah Tayyebeh, a girls’ primary school miles from Tehran. The strike killed 175 people, many of them young girls.

“Well, because we all agree that it’s a tragedy having the school hit, and we all agree now for an investigation,” Fetterman said. “What I don’t agree with the rest of my colleagues in the House is that it’s a war of choice, or it’s dumb, or all the things my colleagues have described, you know, this operation. I think it’s a good thing, and I support that.”

Fetterman was referring to a line in the letter describing Donald Trump’s military campaign as “a war of choice without Congressional authorization.” The letter did not describe the war as “dumb.”

  • Damage
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    All of this is a theatre… If you go to war these things happen, investigating how is, in fact, moot. You can’t start a war and keep your hands clean

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh fuck off. It wasn’t even one whole day before the US blew up ~150 elementary school children.

      • Damage
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        And a lot of other innocent people too, what’s your point?

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          That your statement that an investigation would be moot is absurd.

          Also, the general downplaying of an awful war crime is very off-putting. There’s a very big difference between civilian casualties as collateral damage (still terrible), and straight up targeting an elementary school full of children.

          • Damage
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            You can pretend you can be civilized in a war, but truthfully war is barbarous and criminal in of itself. The crime started when the war started. Investigate all you want and pretend your conscience is clear, it won’t change anything.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              You’re not wrong about war being barbarous and criminal, but this is not black and white. There are levels to this.

              • Damage
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yeah, and bombing from the sky goes through all of them quite fast

                  • Damage
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Precision bombing is a myth. When you bomb you’re ok with hitting hospitals, schools, etc.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      These things happen a lot more frequently when you let “AI” pick your targets for you, based on 10-year old data.

        • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s wasn’t meant to be an “excuse.” It shows that the Trump regime is incompetent. Life or death consequences must never be decided by “AI” and he went and did it anyway.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s 100% meant to be an excuse (not by you, by the administration). They can now do horrifying things, and blame AI. it’s the perfect scapegoat.

          • Damage
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’re drinking the Kool-aid. They don’t care about collateral damage. Nobody in power does, it’s just a show.