• freagle@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are you saying that using nukes against civilian populations was equivalent to conventional bombing because of “the damage”? What point are you trying to make here?

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The point is that Nagasaki and Hiroshima weren’t exceptional, but rather typical of US bombing strategies against civilian populations that the US has continued to use into the modern day.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would say that by the very nature of it being nukes it was exceptional. Like, the very definition of exceptional. Yes, the USA often bombs instead of negotiating, that is not exceptional.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The fire bombing of civilians were terrible and shouldn’t be forgotten in the shade of the mushroom cloud.