This is really a big step in my opinion, as language choices can shape opinions, as the article states “a ‘significant step forward’ in recognizing the preventable nature of road collisions.”

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Good. There is nothing accidental about the horrible way people drive and the utter disregard for other’s lives that they display behind the wheel. Cars are a horrible way of getting around but people’s bad driving makes things so much worse than they need to be.

    My dad and I have jokingly been calling them “intentionals” for a while now.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Why don’t we use the word accident again?”

    “Because accident implies there’s no-one to blame.”

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The official new word is “collision”.

      Also “accident” is being phased out in recognition of the fact that crashes should be prevented, not considered an unavoidable or acceptable downside of automobile use.

      Accident implies there is no culpability.

      • dufkm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The official new word is “collision”.

        Oopsie, I just had a collision in my underwear.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          While I suspect you’re just trying to be funny, this could be read as an attempt to trivialize car-related fatalities by comparing automobile accidents to bowel malfunctions.

          People don’t usually die from pissing themselves.

          Edit: I’m not trying to shit on anyone’s fun, but I leave comments like this because I don’t like the idea of some hypothetical lurker even accidentally walking away with misinterpretations.

          It’s like how you can make fun of bigots using sarcasm, but sometimes they just take you seriously, and walk away thinking you’re one of them. I hate when that happens, and sometimes you wont even know if it did.

            • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Ok, then it’s succeeding at two things.

              I wasn’t commenting on the comedic merit.

            • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              That doesn’t mean people who’d read that comment and go “yeah, you tell em” won’t wander in.

              They’d not even have to interact to walk away thinking they got their word in, and that others agree with them.

      • arin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There goes the automobile industry’s last bits of influence on the public at minimizing the mechanical death machines

  • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The police in the UK have called them “road traffic incidents” for at least 15 years now