The taped banana - now perhaps one of the most expensive fruits ever sold - was actually bought earlier in the day for a mere $0.35, according to the New York Times.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yo I was about to comment this.

      Like literally.

      How do you transfer a huge amount of money.

      Just get the receipient to create “art”

      Instruct receipient to sell “art” for the amount of money

      Voila, legal money laundering!

      • Gsus4@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah, it’s the first thing I thought. Everybody else sees it too, right? This is well past dadaism.

        …but wasn’t this the case all along in the art market, except for institutional buyers?

        • edric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Because you “can’t put a price on art”. Assuming there’s a sales tax or something for the sale, it’s pretty much a legit sale.

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Was commonplace in vanilla wow, you would see common items in the Auction House selling for silly prices - those were the players buying gold. Washing it via the auction house making it seem more legitimate.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I too have a nearly perfect replica of this piece. I’m selling each piece, which is part of an extremely limited run of 1000 pieces in total produced this week on demand, signed and sealed in a Tupperware container for freshness, for $2,990 each, worldwide shipping is just another $299.

  • Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s really just one of a limited number of licenses which allows the owner of the license to showcase the work and legally regard it as an official work from the artist who first came up with the idea. Anyone can tape a banana to a wall, but only a few can do so and say that it’s an ‘original’.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t know if I can trust the license. Any way to make it burn a ton of electricity to function?

    • Mojave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago
      • who gives a shit if it’s original or derivative
      • Tape a different fruit and it’s now a new original
      • huginn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Do this as an institution you’ll get nuked in court.

        Do this as an individual nobody will pay to see it.

        The more you complain the more it’s worth.

        People pay money to see it because it’s controversial.

        That’s why it’s art.

      • Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree, it’s very absurd, and that’s part of the point. It’s also obvious too that someone gives a shit since they’re willing to shell out millions of dollars for it. And as far as taping another piece of fruit to the wall, it unlikely to do well because with modern and conceptual art, it’s all about who came up with the idea first.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Traditional art was just NFTs all along.
    🌍🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀