whoops no this is UC Davis in 2011. the cop pepper spraying these nonviolent student protestors filed for worker’s compensation claiming “psychiatric damage” due to having his name released and won more than $38k USD in compensation.
whoops no this is UC Davis in 2011. the cop pepper spraying these nonviolent student protestors filed for worker’s compensation claiming “psychiatric damage” due to having his name released and won more than $38k USD in compensation.
Ah, I see you all planned some astroturfing in advance. Very credible.
having sources is astroturfing, not having sources is evidence of being correct. of course.
Even if a corporation paid for that, a list of links would still not qualify as astroturfing
No, but we do have reading groups, encourage each other to expand our knowledge, and post useful and interesting links to each other if they’re interested. You know, like most people do, like a community does.
Also: imagine being proud deliberate ignorance.
Jesus christ. I wish you were a bot. Bots actually have an excuse for being unable to exceed their programming.
ad hominem
calling ad hominem when someone isn’t even making an argument is
You fuckers literally cannot fucking help yourself holy shit.
Dumbass
Not only is fallacy reffing stupid, it’s not even an example of ad hominem, it’s just an insult.
Ad hominem: “You’re wrong because you’re a doo doo head.”
Not ad hominem: “You’re a doo doo head and you’re wrong.”
Also not ad hominem: “You’re a doo doo head because you’re wrong.”
Aw fuck oh shit oh fuck
Babybrain
Nah, it just comes up a lot. No worries
Fucking daily. It’s infuriating. It’s so frustrating. Why are they obsessed with a completely absurd fantasy about this one specific incident? Catholics aren’t this obsessive with the crucifixion.