• vzq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The textbook answer, the one you have to learn when you take drivers education around here at least, is that traffic should travel at a speed that is safe in the current situation (taking into account the environmental conditions, the condition of the road etc) but not exceeding the maximum velocity.

      Poor visibility is one of the main reasons to reduce speed. As is things that affect handling, like snow or wet conditions.

      So, “At what speed should a car travel at night in a 40mph zone?”

      I don’t know. But if you almost ran someone over, you probably took a risk you shouldn’t have.

    • Tobberone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      At a speed at which the driver has time to break whatever the driver may encounter on that road.

      Wild life are notoriously bad at wearing high Viz clothing, although I’ve heard the Finns are making progress on the issue.

    • LukeS26 (He/They)@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean the answer obviously depends on what the road is like. Near me, for example, I have 2 different roads that I drive on most often at night, both with speed limits around 35-40. One of them is in town, and has streetlights, stoplights by the crosswalks, and is just generally way better lit. Even so at night visibility is worse, so I’ll go like 10 below the speed limit (maybe only 5 bit depending on if I don’y see/think people are out walking or if I’m not as worried about visibility). The other road is basically a country road. It has trees and farm fields on either side, no lights, and is extremely hilly. Because of all that I go like max 20 or 25 pretty much, so I have enough time to brake for a biker I missed when I went over a hill, or for a deer or other animal that jumps out in front of me.

      The dangerous thing in a crash between a bike and a car is definitely the car, so it should also fall more on the car to be safe. Not to say a bike has no responsibility for their own safety obviously, but a car should be traveling slowly enough that they have the ability to stop without hitting something if they have a sudden need to, and that means potentially going much slower than the speed limit at night.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      This weirdo is clearly here to troll. One of the more bizarre profiles I’ve seen within 5 seconds of looking at it

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ey surely prefers reading to commenting or posting, at least for the most part of the last year.