- cross-posted to:
- energia
- cross-posted to:
- energia
crossposted from:: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/113830959837660426
A study si more than 80k people (that’s a lot) shows that to be healthier, you don’t have to upset your habits or make time for new activities:
Just go #BikeToWork #biketowork
Data:
-41% chance of dying
-45% cardiovascular disease
-46% cancer
+200% fun! (not in the article 😁)
On average. A few of them will have their lives cut short due to people checking their phones while driving or something banal like that.
This is a propaganda piece to make you feel better about home office being over.
That is probably excluding the possibility to get run over by a random car.
Sorry, just almost happened to me this morning and I’m still a bit rattled.
sorry about that, it’s really not funny when this happens.
but actually the data bout death from all causes includes that possibility
Morover:
Cyclist commuters, compared with non-active commuters, were associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation after a traffic collision (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.48), although this was a relatively rare event (83 hospitalisations over 18 years).
and
Similar to our study, commuting by bicycle has previously been associated with a higher risk of hospital admission after a transport related incident in comparison to non-active commuting modes, and consistent with our findings, this study also showed that commuters who cycled to work had a lower risk of CVD, cancer, and death compared with non-active commuters. Other studies have confirmed that the health benefits of cycling are much greater than the risk of injuries.
Heh, that is actually funny they thought to include that, thanks for copying that in.
There’s a correlation, but is there causation? Are people with less healthy habits equally likely to ride a bicycle?
I mean this is the point. If you commute by buìike you get your share of phtysica excecise. Correlation and causation
From the article:
The significant contribution that active commuting makes to total physical activity may explain the positive associations active travel has had with health outcomes. One study found a 44% increase in physical activity levels in individuals who walked to work compared with those who travelled by car. Another Scottish study estimated that 46.5% of all active commuters in 2001 met a daily target of 30 min of moderate intensity activity from their commute alone. Our study did not account for physical activity unrelated to active travel and this may partially explain the larger reduction in all-cause mortality risk associated with cyclist commuting compared with other studies.
That is probably excluding the possibility to get run over by a random car.
All-cause mortality is just that - all-cause. The results of the study do indeed point to an increased chance of hospitalisation from traffic incidents, but bike commuters live longer in spite of this increased risk.
Sorry to hear a driver tried to kill you. This happens to me as well while commuting. We can only hope that one day, they get what they deserve.
What do you get when you cross a car dependent society with a government that treats pedestrians like garbage? I’ll tell you what you get. You get what you fucking deserve!
Jokes aside, nobody who didn’t drive a car, and especially the children, deserved this. This is car drivers committing a mass suicide and bringing the rest of us with them.
The last hazard ratio calculation (traffic casualty) suggests it’s been controlled for.
It’s your fault then for riding a bike. No, we will not stop building car-centric infrastructure. Think of the poor
childrenfossil fuel companiesdrivers. /s
-41% chance of dying
have we finally unlocked the means of immortality?
Biking is great, would recommend
cycling highlander!
forgot to write: “…in the considered interval of time” 😁
deleted by creator