I have seen so many times that systemd is insecure, bloated, etc. So i wonder ¿does it worth to switch to another init system?

  • w2qw@aussie.zone
    476·
    10 months ago

    Switch to sysvinit and you’ll understand the benefit of systemd

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      1·
      10 months ago

      This is a bit of a strawman. SysVinit is hardly the only alternative:

      antiX: sysvinit and runit

      Artix: openrc, runit, s6, and dinit

      Chimera: dinit

      Devuan: sysvinit (default), openrc, runit, sinit

      Dragora: sysvinit + perp

      Gentoo: openrc, systemd

      Guix: shepherd

      Hyperbola: openrc and runit

      KNOPPIX: knoppix-autoconfig

      MX Linux: sysvinit (default), systemd

      Obarun: s6 supervision suite

      Parabola: openrc, sysvinit, s6, systemd (default)

      PCLinuxOS: sysvinit

      Slackware: sysvinit

      Stali: sinit

      Void Linux: runit, openrc

      • w2qw@aussie.zone
        1·
        10 months ago

        Openrc at least is sysvinit based. Pre systemd the options were really sysvinit and upstart. Upstart was even worse than sysvinit such that afaik no one has bothered to try to revive.

    • t0m5k1@lemmy.world
      613·
      10 months ago

      The kind of suggestion that does fuck all. Don’t force your myopic ignorance on others.