Russia + China don’t even have half of USA, though this is also slightly misleading since US have shitton of huge carriers and also much more noncombat vessels like the amphibious assault ships, mobile bases, supply ships etc they need to conduct operations around the world.
Also there’s kinda bullfucking shit there like this estimate for 2030:
United States - The U.S. is expected to remain the dominant global naval power in 2030, thanks to an unmatched combination of sheer tonnage and technological advancement. The U.S. Navy doesn’t just have many ships, it has many massive, cutting-edge ships.
United Kingdom - While the U.K.'s total number of ships is expected to decline, the addition of two new aircraft carriers and the progressive updating of its submarine fleet should establish the U.K. as the #2 maritime power.
China - The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) fleet is older, but larger in number (if not tonnage) fleet than the U.S. Navy fleet, and the PLAN has ambitious plans to keep adding more and more vessels.
How the hell USA have newer and more modern ships than China? Their fleet is something like 3 decades old while nearly entire chinese navy is not even 2 decades old. Also China is continuing the most ambitious navy expansion program and USA don’t even have any clue how to progress with numerous scandals and failures like Zumwalt, LCS, inability to replace old subs, carries being most probably already obsolete by hypersonic missiles etc.
About UK, just lol. Their fleet is few in numbers, have problems with equipment and weapons, carriers break routinely and are also obsolete like the US ones (also needless for anything other than imperializing defenseless nations), and “the progressive updating of its submarine fleet” apparently include superglue in reactor chambers, lol.
About UK, just lol. Their fleet is few in numbers, have problems with equipment and weapons, carriers break routinely and are also obsolete like the US ones (also needless for anything other than imperializing defenseless nations), and “the progressive updating of its submarine fleet” apparently include superglue in reactor chambers, lol.
There’s also the small matter of the planes to put on the carriers; they go out with about 5 F35s on them at the moment, which is, what, 10%? of capacity.
It’s possible they mean in terms of tech the ships are more outdated in China, but as of recently I doubt that. China has been developing some of the most advanced ships recently, but does have less advanced submarines. That being said Russia might be/start sharing some tech with China… and these lists ignore productive capacity, the US can only provide limited vessels, China can ramp up production massively in the case of a war.
Numbers for Chinese, Russian and DPRK navies are inflated by the huge numbers of small coastal defence boats armed with various missiles. Those can theoretically endanger enemy ships, subs and planes on coastal waters so they are counted as military ships.
I’m gonna press doubt for Russia here and ask to see how they count strength
Yeah looks like the global firepower site went with numbers over tonnage and other factors.
The DPRK has a large fleet of patrol vessels but definitely lacking a fleet of large warships as well…
Kinda what I meant, yeah
This is by numbers, here is more detailed date with tonnage:
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/largest-navies-in-the-world
Russia + China don’t even have half of USA, though this is also slightly misleading since US have shitton of huge carriers and also much more noncombat vessels like the amphibious assault ships, mobile bases, supply ships etc they need to conduct operations around the world.
Also there’s kinda bullfucking shit there like this estimate for 2030:
How the hell USA have newer and more modern ships than China? Their fleet is something like 3 decades old while nearly entire chinese navy is not even 2 decades old. Also China is continuing the most ambitious navy expansion program and USA don’t even have any clue how to progress with numerous scandals and failures like Zumwalt, LCS, inability to replace old subs, carries being most probably already obsolete by hypersonic missiles etc.
About UK, just lol. Their fleet is few in numbers, have problems with equipment and weapons, carriers break routinely and are also obsolete like the US ones (also needless for anything other than imperializing defenseless nations), and “the progressive updating of its submarine fleet” apparently include superglue in reactor chambers, lol.
What are those? Sounds like something out of space sci-fi
That’s a cathegory of ships carrying supplies, repair crews, spare parts etc needed to keep the warships operating on prolonged missions. Like those
Thank you
There’s also the small matter of the planes to put on the carriers; they go out with about 5 F35s on them at the moment, which is, what, 10%? of capacity.
deleted by creator
It’s possible they mean in terms of tech the ships are more outdated in China, but as of recently I doubt that. China has been developing some of the most advanced ships recently, but does have less advanced submarines. That being said Russia might be/start sharing some tech with China… and these lists ignore productive capacity, the US can only provide limited vessels, China can ramp up production massively in the case of a war.
Number of ships, subs etc, total number.
Well I sincerely doubt Russian navy is larger than USA’s. Especially in the regions like the Pacific
Numbers for Chinese, Russian and DPRK navies are inflated by the huge numbers of small coastal defence boats armed with various missiles. Those can theoretically endanger enemy ships, subs and planes on coastal waters so they are counted as military ships.