• mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, ideally we shouldn’t be just running celebrities but after 8 months of this shit I don’t give a fuck anymore. Mentally I am here:

    If it works I literally could not care less. Clearly the people want vibes so let’s just give them the fucking vibes and deal with THAT issue when things aren’t actively on fire.

    Whatever else Stewart is, he’s knowledgeable, charismatic, willing to fight for a cause, and DOES genuinely seem to give a fuck about the average person. That’s a damn good start at least.

    And all of THAT is even under the assumption we get something at least vaguely resembling a normal election, which at this point I think is entirely dependent on when exactly Diddler on the Roof finally strokes out on the shitter.

  • bigbabybilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love Jon Stewart as much as the next guy. I think he could do a better job than Trump is doing, but that’s setting a very low bar. Surely there’s someone more qualified than comedy news host John Stewart.

  • Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why the fuck are people so obsessed with celebrities? Elect someone actually competent for the job. Idiots.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d want someone to represent the populace, not the power. I’d want them to be competent in how society works more so than how money works. I’d want them to have both compassion and charisma. Changes should piss off the minority of the electorate, not the majority. Change should be progressive and forward thinking not the old…“How can we capitalize on this and produce a revenue stream?”. I don’t care if they are famous or not. That being said, I do like to be entertained. I am really tired of the sell, sell, sell business shit that goes on nowadays. Hell, you can’t even write and perform a nice pop song anymore without automatically having a new scent and a clothing line. Hawks everywhere, picking apart the dying corpse of mother earth.

  • tamal3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    A lot of people here are condemning celebrity in US politics, and I get it… but at this point in time we might need someone who is already famous yet consistent and trustworthy. Stewart has shown himself to be a good person for decades. He’s also politically informed, progressive, and whip smart.

    We need a candidate who wants real change for the betterment of the working class. Somehow people thought that was Trump… I guess because he said he would be, a few times? And people were hoping hard? And not looking at his track record at all? Also racism? More importantly though: people didn’t think that candidate was Harris, who got pushed through by the Democratic party and ran an uninspiring campaign. Those people didn’t vote. Those people were excited about candidates like Bernie, who’s track record on class issues is indefatigable. Those people could potentially be excited about Jon Stewart tearing shit down for the actually betterment of the poor, and might trust that he would try.

    That’s my read, anyway. A Mamdani could come along and stir up some real enthusiasm, but I think it’s harder for a no-name without a proven record to win a national election. Last time that happened we ended up with Obama, and people still feel burned by his lack of progressive action.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’d normally say “hells no, stop electing celebrities!” but this is a person who is actually politically informed (savvy even) and at this point possibly bthenonoy person why might get the US out of this miserable shit it’s in and on to a path towards an actual representative democracy.

    If anything, Jon Stewart might be the only person able to get the US to stop electing celebrities in the first place

    So yeah, Jon 2028!

  • ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can you stupid fucks stop worshiping celebrities for like FIVE MINUTES.

    I don’t get how mindless our population is.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Eh, I trust Stewart’s motivations, but not necessarily his judgment. I listened to him interview Ezra Klein and Stewart fell for his neoliberal Abundance bullshit without any pushback of critical thought. I could see him getting led astray by some of the same Democratic hacks that destroyed the party.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    234
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Zelenskyy did it. Ukraine would no longer exist as a sovereign nation today if he didn’t; it would have been entirely annexed into Russia right now.

    • 60d@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Exactly. In the US right now, only a comedian is capable of getting the joke. It works everywhere else it’s been tried. Vote Stewart!

    • MrSmith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean, Trump did it and he was a fucking TV clown. The bar is really, really, reaaaaaaally low for who can become the next US president.

      • Mandrilleren@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Probably not. It’s pretty common in history that leaders that are great In crisises aren’t as great in peace times. But it doesn’t really matter because what Ukraine needed was the president they had.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’d be a better analog if everything else Zelenskyy has done as president wasn’t eclipsed by Russia invading. Would he have been considered a good president if that hadn’t happened? We’ll never know.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        72
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        He stepped up as a leader when his nation needed him. That is one of the best qualities to have. Anything else is just whatsboutism that can be applied to anyone.

        • ceenote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Nobody is questioning his bravery or accomplishments, but peacetime politics require particular skills.

          • ramble81@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            35
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The US is in far from normal times. It may not be a military war (yet) but this sure as hell isn’t “peacetime”

      • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Would he have been considered a good president if that hadn’t happened? We’ll never know.

        A quick glance back shows very much no. However, he stepped up for the war.