Man, she is one horny motherfucker. Handies in the theater, blowies in the office, lesbian sex in the car… damn! Where does she find the time to rail against the LGBTQ community in-between fucking all the guys and gals in her office?
I had a girlfriend like her once. Once.
Oh I think she finds plenty of time for railing
An olde’ classic I’m always happy to find in the wild. Well .gif’d! 🥂
What’s her OF?
There was that rumor that she was straight up selected from a prostitution app profile…
At the time I assumed it was sexism, but that is presumably the only way Ted Cruz meets willing women so maybe it was true after all and girl just loved her work.
No, she was clearly hired due to her… Intellect?
It’s fun. Once.
deleted by creator
At the same time?
in a row?
37?!
Hey, try not to suck any dick on the way through the parking lot!
hey you, get back here!
Yes, thirty-seven
I should rewatch Clerks…
Is it up on any of the services?
fmhy
If you do a google search for the movie, it will show you what streamers are hosting a movie in your country.
But then you’re using Google services.
www.wherecanistreamit.com and www.justwatch.com can give you similar info without using the Google ecosystem.
deleted by creator
Being bi and partisan doesn’t make her bipartisan.
the constitution says nothing against having an OnlyFans and being a representative congress.
Sounds like she was definitely having congress.
Boebert’s office and her campaign have yet to respond, but her ex-husband, Jayson Boebert, has denied the allegations.
“I think it is all a fairy tale made up propaganda,” Jayson Boebert said. “I don’t believe any of that. Bad sources.”
Isn’t that the guy who exposed himself to her at a bowling alley or something similar? Credible.
When she was a minor. With her friends who were also minors.
Probably a huge cuck like Kristi Noems husband.
If I had a consensual sexual relationship with her (without the power dynamic thing that makes this worse), I’d be paying her to keep it quiet. What an embarrassing person to be associated with.
That’s not what I meant when I said “fuck Lauren Boebert!”
Wait… so when you said “fuck Spez”… oh, no.
I wouldn’t do it with Trump’s flaccid, deformed, child-bite-scarred stump of a chode on a 10 foot pole anyway.
See this is the rise of feminism female politicians can now be sexual predators as well.
Republicans said they were the party of family values. That is clearly not the case.
Different family values for different folks.
party of family values
Lots of families, value prices!
They never specify which family they take the values from. The de Sades is my guess.
Who am I talking about?
“I value other people’s families…but only if they are 12 or under!!! I’m not bothered if they are a boy or girl”
“I value other families…dogs! Any breed, but I do like the feisty ones.”
“And I value other families couches…leather if possible. It’s easier to clean.”
Feeling more like the Habsburgs
TRY NOT TO HAVE ANY SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH STAFFERS ON THE WALK THROUGH THE PARKING LOT!!!
Hey you get back here!
There’s always room for a clerks reference
In a row?
She’s not fucking children. That’s a massive improvement, even though she’s still a hypocritical cunt.
I mean her son is a different story, but still.
And this is the conservative standard for politicians.
ugh… again? and what off-Broadway show was it during this time?
How dare you!
Beetlejuice was a Broadway show, not off-Broadway! Though she did see the tour in Denver, not the actual Broadway cast.
Did attend. Wasn’t paying much attention to the stage
I doubt that her son made it to such a high profile show.
Consensually? With her?
Egg?
Hate-fucking is consensual
This is absolutely disgusting!
I can’t believe three people had sex with Lauren Boebert
I hear she’s quite handy.
I can’t believe three people had sex with Lauren Boebert
I can. 3 people at the same time… I can too…
We’ve got our best people working this out…
Aside from the hypocrisy I don’t really care at all. So she had sex with three adults? Good for her. I actually think it’s kinda sad that she feels she needs to keep it a secret that she likes women. Other than that, she’s a terrible, terrible person, so I won’t be crying any tears for her.
But you know, there’s an actual sexual predator in your Whitehouse, his whole inner circle is filled with Nazis and pedo’s. When compared to all that, Lauren Boebert should get an award for being so… consensual about sex. I hate her hypocrisy, and she shouldn’t be using government money to book hotel rooms for her sexual escapades, but shaming women for liking sex? Miss me with that shit.
What most people here seem to be missing is that she was fucking her employees.
That’s the problem.
There is a massive power dynamic imbalance when you’re a world-famous politician in one of the highest profile jobs available and you start making moves on underlinings. It’s highly unethical behaviour and has been exactly the conduct that caused many politicians to be ousted and even impeached in the past.
To be fair, Boebert fucking her employees plays into the hierarchical social structure that conservatives support. The fact they’re her subordinates is probably what makes it okay.
While I take your point and agree with the merits of power imbalances inherently muddying the waters of consent, at what stage are we infantilising adults with the capacity to consent? Without knowing the particulars of the circumstances, it’s very difficult to say that she acted in a predatory manner towards these people. In your comment, you suggest the idea that Boebert was the one ‘making moves’ on her staffers. Is there any verified information to suggest this was the case?
My broader question is this: are there any circumstances in which an employee can truly consent to sexual activity with their employer? I worry that answering ‘no’ to that question unfairly infantilises people, while I simultaneously worry that answering ‘yes’ justifies abuse of power to extract sexual favours.
It’s a very difficult puzzle, and one that I would personally argue heavily relies on context and the accounts of those who we fear may have been sexually abused. I’m reminded of the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky saga which posed very similar questions, and to which you’ve also alluded in your comment.
https://ethics.house.gov/publications/code-official-conduct/
It’s a violation of house ethics rules. Hypocrisy aside, its just simply against the rules of a body who’s purpose is to make the laws that govern the rest of us. No tolerance or excuses for that.
my dude, the US elected a pedo, sexual predator, grifter as President, people admire this sort of behaviour.
Pretty much any job anywhere will fire you on the spot for sleeping with a subordinate because it’s obvious that it’s a coercive power dynamic and bad for business and legal risk.
Lol they are wheeling in a barely functioning octagenerian for votes, and have a staffer to correct him when he votes wrong. You think Congress cares about ethics or power dynamics?
Right my comment was intended to hilight how outside the norm this is
Without knowing the particulars of the circumstances, it’s very difficult to say that she acted in a predatory manner towards these people
The power imbalance makes any sexual relationship, even completely consensual ones extremely dodgey. Any kind of boundary setting you’d need to do in a healthy sexual relationship becomes marred with questions of “is this going to impact my ability to buy food?” This is why in most workplaces romantic and sexual relationships between managers and subordinates are explicitly banned.
Regardless of if the individuals she was fucking were fully consenting or not it’s unethical. It’s going to lead to favoritism of those individuals over the ones who aren’t fucking her.
That’s definitely true, though her being a republican in 2026… is she expected to face any real consequences?
I was just about to point this out.
Well the issue is the power disparity there. She was basically these peoples boss. Even if it’s consensual, that’s not really a situation one wants to have. And having someone in power over you make sexual advancements is a huge red flag in any case.
Given she is a political figure, they also left her open to being compromised, which is also something you don’t want to have happen to leaders in government. Given there was $200.000 of hush money paid, I’d say she was indeed compromised.
There’s also the whole hypocrisy part, but that’s par for the course when it comes to Republicans. So while still bad, hardly worth mentioning.
It’s a bit less consensual when you’re having sex with people who rely on your good opinion for their jobs, probably their health insurance. That’s going to make it harder to say no. But at least they’re adults. The republican party has set a low bar.
You, and some others who pointed it out, are right, of course. I forgot to take the whole subordinate-thing into account. Guess my gut reaction was “at least they’re not kids” because that’s the world we live in now.
Honestly I feel a little bad for her. She had kids super young, now she’s single and ready to have her wild phase that she couldn’t have when she was younger because of her responsibilities to her kids, except now she’s a Republican in Congress, so she still has to reign it in! If she wasn’t actively making the world worse with her actions in office I’d actually feel bad for her
It’s actually really easy to not accidentally become a republican congressperson.
Would make a good plot for a sitcom!
“Oops I accidentally became a sitting member in Congress!”
Trickier than you’d think. Just ask Fetterman.
Good to see Republicans having consentual sex with adults
Did she have line management authority over any of the staffers? If not, this is a non-issue except for the hypocrisy.
Oh shit good point. Guess I assume adults having sex should be consexual
You assumed wrong for many conservatives in power. They probably would never get laid if it wasn’t for SA.
thats… a lot of staff fucking.
